Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37857827›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Distinct neural representations during a brain-machine interface and manual reaching task in motor cortex, prefrontal cortex, and striatum.

Ellen L Zippi, Gabrielle F Shvartsman, Nuria Vendrell-Llopis, Joni D Wallis, Jose M Carmena

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ellen L Zippi *Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Gabrielle F Shvartsman *Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Nuria Vendrell-LlopisHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Joni D WallisHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Jose M CarmenaHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. jcarmena@berkeley.edu.
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Neuroscience Training Program at UC BerkeleyT32NS095939 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BATEUP, HELEN S. · 2016 to 2025
$6.3M
Frontostriatal Rhythms Underlying Reinforcement Learning.R01MH117763 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI WALLIS, JONI D · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
Neurophysiologically-informed Design of Flexible, 2-learner Brain-Machine Interfaces for Robust and Skillful PerformanceR01NS106094 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI CARMENA, JOSE MIGUEL · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117763NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS106094NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS095939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) are directly controlled by the modulation of a select local population of neurons, distributed networks consisting of cortical and subcortical areas have been implicated in learning and maintaining control. Previous work in rodents has demonstrated the involvement of the striatum in BMI learning. However, the prefrontal cortex has been largely ignored when studying motor BMI control despite its role in action planning, action selection, and learning abstract tasks. Here, we compare local field potentials simultaneously recorded from primary motor cortex (M1), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and the caudate nucleus of the striatum (Cd) while nonhuman primates perform a two-dimensional, self-initiated, center-out task under BMI control and manual control. Our results demonstrate the presence of distinct neural representations for BMI and manual control in M1, DLPFC, and Cd. We find that neural activity from DLPFC and M1 best distinguishes control types at the go cue and target acquisition, respectively, while M1 best predicts target-direction at both task events. We also find effective connectivity from DLPFC → M1 throughout both control types and Cd → M1 during BMI control. These results suggest distributed network activity between M1, DLPFC, and Cd during BMI control that is similar yet distinct from manual control.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesMotor CortexAnimalsCadmiumLearningPrefrontal CortexCadmium

Identifiers

PMID37857827
PMCPMC10587077
OpenAlexW4387776176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.