Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37857813›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2023

A real-world clinical validation for AI-based MRI monitoring in multiple sclerosis.

Michael Barnett, Dongang Wang, Heidi Beadnall, Antje Bischof, David Brunacci, Helmut Butzkueven, J William L Brown, Mariano Cabezas, Tilak Das, Tej Dugal and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Degenerative cervical myelopathy diagnosis: applicability of artificial intelligence-enhanced modalities in a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Mechanistic Insights into the Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Sclerosis.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Decoding Gray Matter Involvement in Multiple Sclerosis via Imaging.Neuroimaging clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Michael Barnett *Sydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2156-8864
Dongang Wang *Sydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Heidi BeadnallBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Antje BischofDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3862-5738
David BrunacciDepartment of Radiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Helmut ButzkuevenDepartment of Neurology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
J William L BrownDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7737-5834
Mariano CabezasBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Tilak DasDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Tej DugalSydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Daniel GuilfoyleDepartment of Neurology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Alexander KlistornerSydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Stephen KriegerDepartment of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Kain KyleSydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Linda LySydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lynette MastersI-MED Radiology, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Andy ShiehSydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Zihao TangSydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0787-4363
Anneke van der WaltDepartment of Radiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Kayla WardDepartment of Neurology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1926-0529
Heinz WiendlDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Geng ZhanSydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Robert ZivadinovBuffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Yael BarnettSydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Chenyu WangSydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia. tim@snac.com.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7135-7662
The University of Sydney · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUCooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology · AUUniversity Hospital Münster · DEUniversity of Cambridge · GBBuffalo Psychiatric Center · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USNew South Wales Department of Health · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AUThe Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

Cooperative Research Centres, Australian Government Department of Industry (CRCs) CRCPFIVE000141Multiple Sclerosis Research Australia (MSRA) 18-0461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern management of MS targets No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA): no clinical relapses, no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) disease activity and no disability worsening. While MRI is the principal tool available to neurologists for monitoring clinically silent MS disease activity and, where appropriate, escalating treatment, standard radiology reports are qualitative and may be insensitive to the development of new or enlarging lesions. Existing quantitative neuroimaging tools lack adequate clinical validation. In 397 multi-center MRI scan pairs acquired in routine practice, we demonstrate superior case-level sensitivity of a clinically integrated AI-based tool over standard radiology reports (93.3% vs 58.3%), relative to a consensus ground truth, with minimal loss of specificity. We also demonstrate equivalence of the AI-tool with a core clinical trial imaging lab for lesion activity and quantitative brain volumetric measures, including percentage brain volume loss (PBVC), an accepted biomarker of neurodegeneration in MS (mean PBVC -0.32% vs -0.36%, respectively), whereas even severe atrophy (>0.8% loss) was not appreciated in radiology reports. Finally, the AI-tool additionally embeds a clinically meaningful, experiential comparator that returns a relevant MS patient centile for lesion burden, revealing, in our cohort, inconsistencies in qualitative descriptors used in radiology reports. AI-based image quantitation enhances the accuracy of, and value-adds to, qualitative radiology reporting. Scaled deployment of these tools will open a path to precision management for patients with MS.

Identifiers

PMID37857813
PMCPMC10587188
OpenAlexW4387779513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.