Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37857634›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2023

Perturbation and stability of PAM50 subtyping in population-based primary invasive breast cancer.

Srinivas Veerla, Lennart Hohmann, Deborah F Nacer, Johan Vallon-Christersson, Johan Staaf

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02306096 (SCAN-B), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02306096 recruitingnot on this map

SCAN-B: The Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network - Breast Initiative

TypeobservationalSponsorLund UniversityRan2010 to 2031Enrolled20,000ConditionsBreast Neoplasms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. NMR in biomedicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Srinivas VeerlaDivision of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7328-6239
Lennart HohmannDivision of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0281-7140
Deborah F NacerDivision of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7117-1371
Johan Vallon-ChristerssonDivision of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2195-0385
Johan StaafDivision of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. johan.staaf@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5254-5115
Lund University · SE

Funding

Cancerfonden (Swedish Cancer Society) CAN 2021/1407Fru Berta Kamprads Stiftelse (Mrs. Berta Kamprad Foundation) FBKS-2020-5Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 2021-01800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PAM50 gene expression subtypes represent a cornerstone in the molecular classification of breast cancer and are included in risk prediction models to guide therapy. We aimed to illustrate the impact of included genes and biological processes on subtyping while considering a tumor's underlying clinical subgroup defined by ER, PR, and HER2 status. To do this we used a population-representative and clinically annotated early-stage breast tumor cohort of 6233 samples profiled by RNA sequencing and applied a perturbation strategy of excluding co-expressed genes (gene sets). We demonstrate how PAM50 nearest-centroid classification depends on biological processes present across, but also within, ER/PR/HER2 subgroups and PAM50 subtypes themselves. Our analysis highlights several key aspects of PAM50 classification. Firstly, we demonstrate the tight connection between a tumor's nearest and second-nearest PAM50 centroid. Additionally, we show that the second-best subtype is associated with overall survival in ER-positive, HER2-negative, and node-negative disease. We also note that ERBB2 expression has little impact on PAM50 classification in HER2-positive disease regardless of ER status and that the Basal subtype is highly stable in contrast to the Normal subtype. Improved consciousness of the commonly used PAM50 subtyping scheme will aid in our understanding and interpretation of breast tumors that have seemingly conflicting PAM50 classification when compared to clinical biomarkers. Finally, our study adds further support in challenging the common misconception that PAM50 subtypes are distinct classes by illustrating that PAM50 subtypes in tumors represent a continuum with prognostic implications.

Identifiers

PMID37857634
PMCPMC10587090
OpenAlexW4387770134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.