Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37857488›Full record

SynthesisOccupational and environmental medicine2023

Exposure to low-dose radiation in occupational settings and ischaemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cheryl E Peters, Emma Kathleen Quinn, Laura Andrea Rodriguez-Villamizar, Heather MacDonald, Paul J Villeneuve

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cheryl E PetersSchool of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Emma Kathleen QuinnSchool of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3130-259X
Laura Andrea Rodriguez-VillamizarDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-5551-2586
Heather MacDonaldMacOdrum Library, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Paul J VilleneuveDeparment of Neurosciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Paul.Villeneuve@carleton.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-7786-7997

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ionising radiation is a human carcinogen, but the evidence is less clear that exposure to low-dose ionising radiation (LDIR) increases the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. We synthesised the literature of chronic occupational exposure to LDIR and cardiovascular disease, particularly for ischaemic heart disease (IHD).The literature search was conducted using three databases including studies published between 1990 and 2022. A quality assessment of the studies was completed using the Office of Health and Assessment and Translation Risk of Bias Rating Tool. We conducted meta-analyses for IHD mortality using random effects models using measures of excess relative risk per sievert (ERR/Sv) obtained from internal cohort comparisons, as well as with standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) from external cohort comparisons.We identified 2189 articles, and of these, 26 provided data on IHD and were retained. Most studies were classified as having a 'moderate' level of risk of bias. Fourteen and 10 studies reporting external radiation doses were included in meta-analyses using SMR and ERR/Sv, respectively. The meta-summary SMR was 0.81 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.89) with evidence of reduced risk but high heterogeneity across studies. For internal cohort measures, the summary ERR/Sv for a lagged exposure of 10 years was 0.10 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.20) with low heterogeneity. The subgroup analysis by lagged exposure time showed the strongest association were for the 15 and 20 years lag.Our findings suggest that occupational exposure to LDIR increases the risk IHD mortality and highlight the relevance of internal cohort comparisons.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesMyocardial IschemiaOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureRadiation ExposureHumansRadiation, IonizingRiskCardiologyOccupational HealthRadiation, Ionizing

Identifiers

PMID37857488
PMCPMC10715561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.