Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37856550›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

PARROT: Prediction of enzyme abundances using protein-constrained metabolic models.

Mauricio Alexander de Moura Ferreira, Wendel Batista da Silveira, Zoran Nikoloski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mauricio Alexander de Moura FerreiraDepartment of Microbiology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6545-6813
Wendel Batista da SilveiraDepartment of Microbiology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7869-8144
Zoran NikoloskiBioinformatics, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2671-6763

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein allocation determines the activity of cellular pathways and affects growth across all organisms. Therefore, different experimental and machine learning approaches have been developed to quantify and predict protein abundance and how they are allocated to different cellular functions, respectively. Yet, despite advances in protein quantification, it remains challenging to predict condition-specific allocation of enzymes in metabolic networks. Here, using protein-constrained metabolic models, we propose a family of constrained-based approaches, termed PARROT, to predict how much of each enzyme is used based on the principle of minimizing the difference between a reference and an alternative growth condition. To this end, PARROT variants model the minimization of enzyme reallocation using four different (combinations of) distance functions. We demonstrate that the PARROT variant that minimizes the Manhattan distance between the enzyme allocation of a reference and an alternative condition outperforms existing approaches based on the parsimonious distribution of fluxes or enzymes for both Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Further, we show that the combined minimization of flux and enzyme allocation adjustment leads to inconsistent predictions. Together, our findings indicate that minimization of protein allocation rather than flux redistribution is a governing principle determining steady-state pathway activity for microorganism grown in alternative growth conditions.

Indexed as

ParrotsAnimalsCell Physiological PhenomenaEscherichia coliMetabolic Networks and PathwaysModels, BiologicalSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID37856550
PMCPMC10617714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.