Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37856454›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Epigenetic weapons in plant-herbivore interactions: Sulforaphane disrupts histone deacetylases, gene expression, and larval development in Spodoptera exigua while the specialist feeder Trichoplusia ni is largely resistant to these effects.

Dana J Somers, David B Kushner, Alexandria R McKinnis, Dzejlana Mehmedovic, Rachel S Flame, Thomas M Arnold

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Proteomics analysis of soluble secreted proteins ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dana J SomersDepartment of Biology, Program in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA United States of America.
David B KushnerDepartment of Biology, Program in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6260-5094
Alexandria R McKinnisDepartment of Biology, Program in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA United States of America.
Dzejlana MehmedovicDepartment of Biology, Program in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA United States of America.
Rachel S FlameDepartment of Biology, Program in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA United States of America.
Thomas M ArnoldDepartment of Biology, Program in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA United States of America.
Dickinson College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cruciferous plants produce sulforaphane (SFN), an inhibitor of nuclear histone deacetylases (HDACs). In humans and other mammals, the consumption of SFN alters enzyme activities, DNA-histone binding, and gene expression within minutes. However, the ability of SFN to act as an HDAC inhibitor in nature, disrupting the epigenetic machinery of insects feeding on these plants, has not been explored. Here, we demonstrate that SFN consumed in the diet inhibits the activity of HDAC enzymes and slows the development of the generalist grazer Spodoptera exigua, in a dose-dependent fashion. After consuming SFN for seven days, the activities of HDAC enzymes in S. exigua were reduced by 50%. Similarly, larval mass was reduced by 50% and pupation was delayed by 2-5 days, with no additional mortality. Similar results were obtained when SFN was applied topically to eggs. RNA-seq analyses confirm that SFN altered the expression of thousands of genes in S. exigua. Genes associated with energy conversion pathways were significantly downregulated while those encoding for ribosomal proteins were dramatically upregulated in response to the consumption of SFN. In contrast, the co-evolved specialist feeder Trichoplusia ni was not negatively impacted by SFN, whether it was consumed in their diet at natural concentrations or applied topically to eggs. The activities of HDAC enzymes were not inhibited and development was not disrupted. In fact, SFN exposure sometimes accelerated T. ni development. RNA-seq analyses revealed that the consumption of SFN alters gene expression in T. ni in similar ways, but to a lesser degree, compared to S. exigua. This apparent resistance of T. ni can be overwhelmed by unnaturally high levels of SFN or by exposure to more powerful pharmaceutical HDAC inhibitors. These results demonstrate that dietary SFN interferes with the epigenetic machinery of insects, supporting the hypothesis that plant-derived HDAC inhibitors serve as "epigenetic weapons" against herbivores.

Indexed as

Histone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesAnimalsEpigenesis, GeneticGene ExpressionHerbivoryHumansIsothiocyanatesMammalsSpodopteraSulfoxidesHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesIsothiocyanatessulforaphaneSulfoxides

Identifiers

PMID37856454
PMCPMC10586618
OpenAlexW4387782276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.