Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37856439›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Development and validation of the Economic Coercion Scale-20 (ECS-20): A short-form of the ECS-36.

Stephanie Spaid Miedema, Yuk Fai Cheong, Ruchira Tabassum Naved, Kathryn M Yount

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephanie Spaid MiedemaDepartment of Sociology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Yuk Fai CheongDepartment of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Ruchira Tabassum NavedInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Kathryn M YountDepartment of Sociology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1917-1574

Funding

Intimate Partner Coercion and Implications for Women’s Health and Well-beingR21HD093027 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI YOUNT, KATHRYN M · 2017 to 2018
$383k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD093027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Economic Coercion Scale 36 (ECS-36) is a validated scale measuring women's exposure to economic coercion for low-income countries. A valid short form is needed to facilitate parsimonious measurement of economic coercion in general surveys or program evaluations. We used data from a probability sample of 930 married women 15-49 years in Matlab, Bangladesh. We selected 21 items from the ECS-36 based on theory, content coverage, and item and dimensional information. We evaluated external validity with measures of non-economic intimate partner violence and depressive symptoms. We tested measurement invariance of the short-form scale across participants and non-participants of microfinance programs. A final, 20-item scale captured husband's interference with wife's (1) acquisition of economic resources and (2) use or maintenance of economic resources. IRT results of the ECS-20 demonstrated precision over the higher range of the economic coercion trait. Tests of external validity confirmed expected correlations of the ECS-20 with measures of IPV and depressive symptoms. The ECS-20 was measurement invariant across groups of women who did and did not participate in microfinance programs. The ECS-20, a valid short-form of the ECS-36, is suitable for general surveys and monitoring potential adverse impacts of microfinance programs targeting women.

Indexed as

CoercionIntimate Partner ViolenceBangladeshFemaleHumansMarriageSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37856439
PMCPMC10586689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.