Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37856181›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Radiology Residents' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Yanhua Chen, Ziye Wu, Peicheng Wang, Linbo Xie, Mengsha Yan, Maoqing Jiang, Zhenghan Yang, Jianjun Zheng, Jingfeng Zhang, Jiming Zhu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07558746 (AI Reliance in Diagnostic Radiology Among Intern Doctors in Palestine), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07558746 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

AI Reliance in Diagnostic Radiology Among Intern Doctors in Palestine: A Triple-Arm, Triple-Blind, Parallel-Design Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAl-Quds UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled159ConditionsRadiology, Internship and Residency, AI (Artificial Intelligence)ArmsAI prompt (Correct), AI prompt (Incorrect)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yanhua ChenVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6603-1975
Ziye WuVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0001-6655-0975
Peicheng WangVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6105-1053
Linbo XieVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0002-8240-6954
Mengsha YanVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1493-2565
Maoqing JiangDepartment of Radiology, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8734-2067
Zhenghan YangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1053-9582
Jianjun ZhengDepartment of Radiology, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0591-4528
Jingfeng Zhang *Department of Radiology, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2473-6106
Jiming Zhu *Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3545-1525

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is transforming various fields, with health care, especially diagnostic specialties such as radiology, being a key but controversial battleground. However, there is limited research systematically examining the response of "human intelligence" to AI.

objectiveThis study aims to comprehend radiologists' perceptions regarding AI, including their views on its potential to replace them, its usefulness, and their willingness to accept it. We examine the influence of various factors, encompassing demographic characteristics, working status, psychosocial aspects, personal experience, and contextual factors.

methodsBetween December 1, 2020, and April 30, 2021, a cross-sectional survey was completed by 3666 radiology residents in China. We used multivariable logistic regression models to examine factors and associations, reporting odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs.

resultsIn summary, radiology residents generally hold a positive attitude toward AI, with 29.90% (1096/3666) agreeing that AI may reduce the demand for radiologists, 72.80% (2669/3666) believing AI improves disease diagnosis, and 78.18% (2866/3666) feeling that radiologists should embrace AI. Several associated factors, including age, gender, education, region, eye strain, working hours, time spent on medical images, resilience, burnout, AI experience, and perceptions of residency support and stress, significantly influence AI attitudes. For instance, burnout symptoms were associated with greater concerns about AI replacement (OR 1.89; P<.001), less favorable views on AI usefulness (OR 0.77; P=.005), and reduced willingness to use AI (OR 0.71; P<.001). Moreover, after adjusting for all other factors, perceived AI replacement (OR 0.81; P<.001) and AI usefulness (OR 5.97; P<.001) were shown to significantly impact the intention to use AI.

conclusionsThis study profiles radiology residents who are accepting of AI. Our comprehensive findings provide insights for a multidimensional approach to help physicians adapt to AI. Targeted policies, such as digital health care initiatives and medical education, can be developed accordingly.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadiologyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIntelligenceRadiographyacceptanceadoptionartificial intelligencecross sectionalhealth care servicesperceptionperceptionsradiologyreadinessresidencyresidentresidentssurveytechnology acceptance

Identifiers

PMID37856181
PMCPMC10623237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.