ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2023
Diverse Research Teams and Underrepresented Groups in Clinical Studies.
Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recruitment and Retention of Racially Minoritized Families in a Pediatric Behavioral Diabetes Research Study.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2026Article
- A quality improvement project to optimize the neonatology research experience for families.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Drivers of Research Participation Among Racially and Ethnically Underrepresented Women: Insights from Semi-Structured Interviews.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Methodological Framework for the Design and Implementation of a US Latine-Hispanic Digital Brain Health Program: User-Centered Design Approach.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- "Academia Is a Very Unforgiving Space": A Qualitative Study of Challenges Faced by Under-represented Scholars in Biomedical Research.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Racial disparities in ophthalmology clinical trials: barriers to participation and potential solutions.Eye (London, England) · 2026Review
- Centering Community Engagement in a Hypertension Clinical Trial: Strategies to Engage Rural Black Patients in the Southeastern Collaboration to Improve Blood Pressure Control.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Exploring Perceptions and Motivations for Research Participation Among Black Communities.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Improving representation in critical care research.Intensive care medicine · 2025Article
- Promoting Diversity through an Understanding of Barriers and Drivers for Inclusive Clinical Trials.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
- Diversity in decentralized clinical trials: prioritizing inclusion of underrepresented groups.BMC medical ethics · 2025Review
- The Importance of Including Underserved Populations in Research.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2025Review
- Prospective Preference Assessment of a Pharmacological Clinical Trial to Alter the Progression of Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis After ACL Reconstruction.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Factors Associated With Minority Patient Enrollment in a Gastric Cancer Biobank.The Journal of surgical research · 2025Article
- TheFrontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Building Up a Biomedical Research Workforce Trial.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Examining recollections of Black women with breast cancer who participated in clinical trials: A grounded practical theory study of patient-provider communication.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2024Article
- Training Clinical Scientists: At All Career Stages.Neurology · 2024Article
- Are community oncology practices with or without clinical research programs different? A comparison of patient and practice characteristics.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Article
- Sex or Gender Reporting in Ophthalmology Clinical Trials Among US Food and Drug Administration Approvals, 1995 to 2022.JAMA ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Several ophthalmic diseases disproportionately affect racial and ethnic minority patients, yet most clinical trials struggle to enroll cohorts that are demographically representative of disease burden; some barriers to recruitment include time and transportation, language and cultural differences, and fear and mistrust of research due to historical abuses. Incorporating diversity within the research team has been proposed as a method to increase trust and improve engagement among potential study participants. Objective: To examine how demographic factors of potential research participants and personnel may be associated with patient consent rates to participate in prospective ophthalmic clinical studies. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included patients from an urban, academic hospital who were approached for consent to participate in prospective ophthalmic clinical studies conducted between January 2015 and December 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Multivariable logistic regression assessing associations between patient and research personnel demographics and rates of affirmative consent to participate was used. Results: In total, 1380 patients (mean [SD] age, 58.6 [14.9] years; 50.3% male) who were approached for consent to participate in 10 prospective ophthalmic clinical studies were included. Of prospective patients, 566 (43.5%) were Black; 327 (25.1%), Hispanic or Latino; 373 (28.6%), White; 36 (2.8%), other race and ethnicity; and 78 (5.8%) declined to answer. Black patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.24-0.44; P < .001) and Hispanic or Latino patients (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.20-0.47; P < .001) were less likely to consent compared with White patients. Patients with lower socioeconomic status were less likely to consent than patients with higher socioeconomic status (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.33-0.53; P < .001). Concordance between patient and research staff race and ethnicity was associated with increased odds of affirmative consent (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.99-3.73; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, patients from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups and those with lower socioeconomic status were less likely to participate in ophthalmic clinical studies. Concordance of race and ethnicity between patients and research staff was associated with improved participant enrollment. These findings underscore the importance of increasing diversity in clinical research teams to improve racial and ethnic representation in clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.