ArticleAdvances in therapy2024
One-Year Consistent Safety, Utilization, and Efficacy Assessment of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) for Migraine Treatment.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05760638 (Real-World Evidence), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Real-World Evidence (RWE) Data Analysis of 1-year Safety, Consistent Utilization, and Consistent Efficacy of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN)
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Real-World Evidence Study on US Patients Demonstrating Safety of High-Frequency Use of the Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) Wearable Device for Migraine Treatment.Pain and therapy · 2026Article
- Practice-Based Consensus Amongst Indian Neurologists: Adopting Remote Electrical Neuromodulation for Effective Management of Migraine.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- The Mechanism of Action of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) in Treating Migraine and Potentially Other Idiopathic Pain Conditions.Current pain and headache reports · 2025Review
- Non-Invasive Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Headache.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025Review
- Efficacy of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) on Migraine-Induced Neuronal Activity: A Systematic Review.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Neuromodulation in Chronic Migraine: Evidence and Recommendations from the GRADE Framework.Advances in therapy · 2025Review
- Acute treatment of migraine in children aged 6-11: Real-world analysis of remote electrical neuromodulation (REN).Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMigraine is a chronic neurological disorder causing severe pain and disability in more than a billion people worldwide. Ideal treatment should provide long-term efficacy with minimal side effects. Previous studies indicate that remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) is an efficacious and safe treatment option for the acute treatment of migraine in clinical practice. This study examined long-term safety, utilization, and efficacy of REN during 12 consecutive usage months.
methodsData from patients with migraine across the USA using REN to treat their migraine attacks were electronically collected from the Nerivio
resultsData were analyzed from 409 people living with migraine who treated with REN for 12 consecutive months, performing a total of 39,531 treatments. The incidence of device-related adverse events (dAEs) was 1.96% (8/409), including two negligible (0.49%), five mild (1.22%), one moderate (0.24%), and no severe events. All patients continued treatment with REN despite dAEs. One-year average monthly utilization was 8.05 treatments (SD 1.15). Month-to-month utilization did not change during 12 months of consecutive use [F(4.895, 1997.204) = 2.014, p = 0.075, repeated-measures ANOVA]. One-year average efficacy showed 74.1% of users reported consistent 2-h pain relief, and 26.0% reported consistent pain freedom. Month-to-month pain relief and pain freedom did not change during 12 months of consecutive use [F(11, 1069) = 0.55, p = 0.873 and F(11, 1295) = 0.69, p = 0.750 respectively; generalized linear mixed model analysis].
conclusionREN is a safe and well-tolerated acute migraine treatment, with stable efficacy and utilization over 1 year, making it an advantageous non-drug option for the long-term management of this chronic disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05760638.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.