Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37855973›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2024

One-Year Consistent Safety, Utilization, and Efficacy Assessment of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) for Migraine Treatment.

Andrea Synowiec, Alit Stark-Inbar, Maya Weinstein, Alon Ironi, Alexander Mauskop

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05760638 (Real-World Evidence), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05760638 completednot on this map

Real-World Evidence (RWE) Data Analysis of 1-year Safety, Consistent Utilization, and Consistent Efficacy of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN)

TypeobservationalSponsorTheranicaRan2023 to 2023Enrolled409ConditionsMigraineArmsNerivio
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Non-Invasive Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Headache.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrea SynowiecAllegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-4986-4856
Alit Stark-InbarTheranica Bio-Electronics, Netanya, Israel. alitsi@theranica.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6434-6447
Maya WeinsteinThe Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-3050-6526
Alon IroniTheranica Bio-Electronics, Netanya, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-3992-4978
Alexander MauskopThe New York Headache Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2861-5184
Allegheny Health Network · USHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILNew York Proton Center · USSafran Electronics (Canada) · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMigraine is a chronic neurological disorder causing severe pain and disability in more than a billion people worldwide. Ideal treatment should provide long-term efficacy with minimal side effects. Previous studies indicate that remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) is an efficacious and safe treatment option for the acute treatment of migraine in clinical practice. This study examined long-term safety, utilization, and efficacy of REN during 12 consecutive usage months.

methodsData from patients with migraine across the USA using REN to treat their migraine attacks were electronically collected from the Nerivio

resultsData were analyzed from 409 people living with migraine who treated with REN for 12 consecutive months, performing a total of 39,531 treatments. The incidence of device-related adverse events (dAEs) was 1.96% (8/409), including two negligible (0.49%), five mild (1.22%), one moderate (0.24%), and no severe events. All patients continued treatment with REN despite dAEs. One-year average monthly utilization was 8.05 treatments (SD 1.15). Month-to-month utilization did not change during 12 months of consecutive use [F(4.895, 1997.204) = 2.014, p = 0.075, repeated-measures ANOVA]. One-year average efficacy showed 74.1% of users reported consistent 2-h pain relief, and 26.0% reported consistent pain freedom. Month-to-month pain relief and pain freedom did not change during 12 months of consecutive use [F(11, 1069) = 0.55, p = 0.873 and F(11, 1295) = 0.69, p = 0.750 respectively; generalized linear mixed model analysis].

conclusionREN is a safe and well-tolerated acute migraine treatment, with stable efficacy and utilization over 1 year, making it an advantageous non-drug option for the long-term management of this chronic disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05760638.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersDouble-Blind MethodHeadacheHumansPain ManagementTreatment OutcomeEfficacyLong-termMigraineNon-pharmacologicalProspectiveReal-world evidenceRemote electrical neuromodulationRENSafetyUtilization

Identifiers

PMID37855973
PMCPMC10796417
OpenAlexW4387765093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.