Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37855923›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2024

The optimal fluoroscopic views to rule out intra-articular screw penetration during acetabular fracture fixation.

Aissam Elmhiregh, Ashraf T Hantouly, Osama Alzoubi, Bivin George, Mohsen Ahmadi, Ghalib Ahmed

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The infraacetabular screw - anatomy, radiology, biomechanics and clinics.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Review
  7. Acetabular posterior column screws via an anterior approach.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aissam ElmhireghDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Specialty Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Ashraf T HantoulyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Specialty Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Osama AlzoubiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Specialty Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Bivin GeorgeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Specialty Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Mohsen AhmadiClinical Imaging Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Ghalib AhmedDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Surgical Specialty Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar. ghaliboudah@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4326-7250
Hamad Medical Corporation · QA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the ideal view(s) and the minimum number of intraoperative fluoroscopic views required to rule out any intra-articular screw violation in acetabular fractures fixation.

methodsThis study was conducted using a series of fluoroscopic examinations of pelvic synthetic models with screws positioned in different planes around the acetabulum. Ten screws were placed in the synthetic pelvis models in different planes of the acetabulum. Seven views were taken for each screw. Radiographic images were evaluated by 14 orthopaedic surgeons who were asked to assess joint violation and the view(s) required for assessment.

resultsThe observers' accuracy rate in identifying joint violation was 82.1% for the anterior part of the anterior column and the superior part of the posterior column, 89.3% for the posterior part of the anterior column and the inferior part of the posterior column, and 92.9% for the quadrilateral plate. The sensitivity was 100% for the anterior and posterior parts of the anterior column and the inferior part of the posterior column, 87.5% for the superior part of the posterior column, and 85.7% for the quadrilateral plate. The specificity was 100% for the quadrilateral plate, 80% for the superior part of the posterior column and the posterior part of the anterior column, 78.6% for the inferior part of the posterior column, and 66.7% for the anterior part of the anterior column. There was a strong overall interobserver and intra-observer agreement with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.709 and 0.86, respectively.

conclusionsThis study confirms the hypothesis that in a concave surface/joint fixation, such as the acetabulum, the probability of joint violation is unlikely if there is no evidence of it within a single fluoroscopic view. In acetabulum fracture fixation with a screw violating the joint, the screw's presence was evident within the joint space in all fluoroscopic views. However, the absence of joint violation in one fluoroscopic view was adequate to rule out joint penetration.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneHip FracturesSpinal FracturesAcetabulumBone ScrewsFracture Fixation, InternalHumansAcetabulumComplicationsFluoroscopyFractureIntra-articular screw

Identifiers

PMID37855923
PMCPMC10766808
OpenAlexW4387765420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.