Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37855901›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2023

[An app for informal care : User experiences and obstacles from the perspective of family caregivers].

Annika Hudelmayer, Kenneth Zur Kammer, Johanna Schütz

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Annika HudelmayerBayerisches Zentrum Pflege Digital, Hochschule Kempten, Albert-Einstein-Str. 6, 87437, Kempten (Allgäu), Deutschland. annika.hudelmayer@hs-kempten.de.
Kenneth Zur KammerBayerisches Zentrum Pflege Digital, Hochschule Kempten, Albert-Einstein-Str. 6, 87437, Kempten (Allgäu), Deutschland.
Johanna SchützBayerisches Zentrum Pflege Digital, Hochschule Kempten, Albert-Einstein-Str. 6, 87437, Kempten (Allgäu), Deutschland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0274-2919

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA target group for digital services are people who are involved in informal care arrangements. Family caregivers often undertake the organization and coordination of care, which is associated with a high need for information.

objectiveThe study examined the extent to which family caregivers perceive the use of a mobile digital application as facilitating day to day care, in particular regarding information needs. MATERIAL AND

methodsA market-ready mobile smartphone app was used by 16 informal caregivers over several months. Qualitative interviews were conducted to investigate which app features are being used in real informal care situations and which are perceived as added value. The analysis was carried out with content analysis according to Kuckartz.

resultsThe app was sporadically used and satisfaction with the information it provides depends on the care situation itself. The participants see added value and facilitation through the app mainly at the beginning of a care situation. They expressed the wish for requirements that have not yet been integrated, e.g., regional information or individual adaptations.

conclusionFor digital support options to develop the desired potential, those involved in informal care must be aware of them at an early stage. Further prerequisites for care apps to be perceived as added value by the target group are a trustworthy presentation of the contents, the customizability and that they are up to date.

Indexed as

CaregiversMobile ApplicationsAwarenessDay Care, MedicalHumansPatient CareCaregiversDigital technologyHome careQualitative methodsSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID37855901
PMCPMC10709374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.