Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37855854›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

How accurate is MRI for diagnosing tarsal coalitions? A retrospective diagnostic accuracy study.

Adrian A Marth, Georg C Feuerriegel, Roy P Marcus, Reto Sutter

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adrian A MarthDepartment of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. adrian.marth@balgristcampus.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7334-0757
Georg C FeuerriegelDepartment of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Roy P MarcusDepartment of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Reto SutterDepartment of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, inter-reader agreement, and associated pathologies on MR images of patients with confirmed TC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this retrospective study, 168 ankle MRI exams were included, consisting of 56 patients with clinically or surgically confirmed TC and 112 controls without TC, matched for age and sex. Images were analyzed independently by three radiologists blinded to clinical information. The evaluation criteria included the presence, type, and location of TC, as well as associated pathologies. After calculating diagnostic accuracy and the odds ratio of demographic data and anatomic coalition type for associated pathologies, inter-reader agreement was assessed using kappa statistics.

resultsThe majority of TCs were non-osseous (91.1%) and located at the calcaneonavicular (33.9%) or talocalcaneal joint (66.1%). Associated pathologies included adjacent and distant bone marrow edema (57.1% and 25.0%), osteochondral defect of the talar dome (OCD, 19.6%), and joint effusion (10.7%) and accessory anterolateral talar facet (17.9%). Talar OCD was associated with increased patient age (p = 0.03). MRI exhibited a cumulative sensitivity and specificity of 95.8% and 94.3% with almost perfect inter-reader agreement (κ = 0.895).

conclusionMRI is a reliable method for detecting tarsal coalition and identifying commonly associated pathologies. Therefore, we recommend the routine use of MRI in the diagnostic workup of patients with foot pain and suspected tarsal coalition. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: MRI is an accurate and reliable modality for diagnosing tarsal coalitions and detecting associated pathologies, while improving patient safety compared to computed tomography by avoiding radiation exposure. KEY POINTS: • Despite the technological progress in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) is still regarded as the gold standard for diagnosing tarsal coalition (TC). • MRI had a cumulative sensitivity of 95.8% and specificity of 94.3% for detecting tarsal coalition with an almost perfect inter-reader agreement. • MRI demonstrates high accuracy and reliability in diagnosing tarsal coalitions and is useful for identifying associated pathologies, while also improving patient safety by avoiding radiation exposure.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSensitivity and SpecificityTarsal CoalitionAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultData accuracyMRITarsal bonesTarsal coalition

Identifiers

PMID37855854
PMCPMC11126476
OpenAlexW4387764452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.