ArticlePharmacoEconomics2024
Launch and Post-Launch Prices of Injectable Cancer Drugs in the US: Clinical Benefit, Innovation, Epidemiology, and Competition.
Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Breast cancer drugs: FDA approval, development time, efficacy, clinical benefits, innovation, trials, endpoints, quality of life, value, and price.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Pooled it
- With Great Cost Comes Great Responsibility: Who Will Own the Rising Costs of Bladder Cancer Care?The Journal of urology · 2026Article
- Advancing cancer therapeutics: new perspectives on mechanisms, regulatory and policy challenges, and innovative multi-modality strategies for the early detection of cardiotoxicity.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
- Emerging Perspectives on Adverse Childhood Experiences and Brain Cancer Immunotherapy.Cancers · 2026Article
- Compliance with the Veterans Health Administration's Pharmacy Benefit Management guidance for duration of clopidogrel following peripheral vascular interventions: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- Global disparities in access to diagnostics and therapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: from discovery to delivery - a review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Price transparency of cancer medicines: a crucial step towards informed pricing negotiations in the European region.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- From Interaction to Intervention: Intentional CYP Inhibition as a Scalable Strategy to Expand Access to High-Cost Therapies.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2026Review
- Biologic Drug Prices in Medicare Part B After Entry of Biosimilars to the Market.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- On the potential value of eHTA: a commentary on "Defining Early Health Technology Assessment: Building Consensus Using Delphi Technique".International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- Pricing for Multi-Indication Drugs in the Italian Regulatory Context.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2025Article
- Value-Based Indication-Specific Pricing and Weighted-Average Pricing: Estimated Price and Cost Savings for Cancer Drugs.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Article
- An analysis of US net cancer drug launch prices and clinical efficacy and certainty of evidence from 2008 to 2022.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Trends in complexity of single-agent and combination therapies for solid tumor cancers approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.The oncologist · 2025Article
- The high costs of anticancer therapies in the USA: challenges, opportunities and progress.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2024Review
- Impact of competition on reimbursement decisions for cancer drugs in China: an observational study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Special FDA designations for drug development: orphan, fast track, accelerated approval, priority review, and breakthrough therapy.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024Review
- The impact of willingness-to-pay threshold on price reduction recommendations for oncology drugs: a review of assessments conducted by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRising cancer drug prices adversely affect patients' adherence and survival.
objectiveWe aimed to identify and quantify factors associated with launch prices and post-launch price changes of injectable cancer drugs in the US from 2005 to 2023. DATA AND
methodsAll anticancer drugs with US FDA approval between 2000 and 2022 were identified in the Drugs@FDA database. The sample was then restricted to cancer drugs covered under Medicare Part B (injectable drugs). Data characterizing each drug's clinical benefits, disease epidemiology, approved indications, competition, and price were obtained from FDA labels, the Global Burden of Disease study, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The association between launch/post-launch prices and collected variables was assessed in random-effects regressions.
resultsOf 170 cancer drugs with FDA approval between 2000 and 2022, we identified 66 (39%) injectable cancer drugs with quarterly price data from 2005 to 2023. In 2023, mean prices amounted to $27,688 per month, with an average price increase of 94% from 2005 to 2023. Launch and post-launch price changes were significantly associated with the treated disease epidemiology. A 1% decline in disease incidence was associated with a 0.2511% (p = 0.008) increase in launch prices and a 0.0086% (p = 0.032) annual increase in post-launch prices. Accordingly, launch prices were 120% (p = 0.051) higher for orphan than non-orphan drugs, with 3% (p = 0.008) greater annual post-launch price increases. Post-launch prices declined by up to -2% annually as new supplemental indications were approved for the same drug. We found no consistent association between launch/post-launch prices and the drugs' clinical benefit in terms of overall survival, progression-free survival, and tumor response. The market entry of new competitors was not associated with price reductions. 28 of 33 drug pairs within the same class had positive correlation coefficients. Pearson correlation coefficients were high (>0.80) for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, CD38 antibodies, CD20 antibodies, HER2 antibodies, and mTOR inhibitors.
conclusionsCancer drug prices regularly increase faster than inflation; however, there is no evidence that launch prices and post-launch price changes are aligned with the clinical benefit a drug offers to patients. In particular, patients with rare diseases experience greater price increases for their orphan drugs. There is no evidence that brand-brand competition results in drug price reductions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.