Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37855022›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

Safety and efficacy of multimatrix mesalamine in paediatric patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: a phase 3, randomised, double-blind study.

Nicholas Michael Croft, Bartosz Korczowski, Jarosław Kierkuś, Beatriz Caballero, Manoj Kumar Thakur

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02093663 (A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of MMX Mesalamine/Mesalazine in Pediatric Subjects With Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis, in Both Acute and Maintenance Phases), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02093663 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of MMX Mesalamine/Mesalazine in Pediatric Subjects With Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis, in Both Acute and Maintenance Phases

TypeinterventionalSponsorShireRan2014 to 2018Enrolled107ConditionsUlcerative ColitisArmsMMX Mesalamine/Mesalazine (Low Dose), MMX Mesalamine/Mesalazine (High Dose)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Nicholas Michael CroftFaculty of Medicine, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Bartosz KorczowskiDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Gastroenterology, College of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland.
Jarosław KierkuśDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Feeding Disorders, Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Beatriz CaballeroTakeda Clinical Science, Zurich, Switzerland.
Manoj Kumar ThakurTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Lexington, MA, USA.
Children's Memorial Health Institute · PLQueen Mary University of London · GBTakeda (Switzerland) · CHTakeda (United States) · USUniversity of Rzeszów · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated the tolerability and efficacy of multimatrix mesalamine in inducing and maintaining remission in adults with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of low-dose and high-dose once-daily multimatrix mesalamine in children and adolescents with mild-to-moderate UC or those in remission. Methods: This prospective, randomised, parallel-group, phase 3 study (8-week double-blind acute [DBA] phase; 26-week double-blind maintenance [DBM] phase; and an additional 8-week, open-label acute [OLA] phase) was conducted in 33 sites across North America, Europe, and the Middle East between December 12, 2014, and November 28, 2018. Eligible patients aged 5-17 years and weighing 18-90 kg were randomised 1:1 to either low (900-2400 mg) or high (1800-4800 mg) oral doses of multimatrix mesalamine once daily, stratified by body weight. Interactive response technology was used for randomisation. The primary efficacy outcome was to estimate the clinical response of multimatrix mesalamine (two doses) in different weight groups. Efficacy and safety analyses were conducted in the safety analysis set (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02093663; Study completed). Findings: Overall, 107 patients were randomised into the DBA (n = 54) or DBM phase (n = 88; directly or after completing the double-blind or OLA phases); the overall safety analysis set included 105 patients. In the DBA phase, the high-dose group (n = 17; 65.4%) achieved a higher clinical response rate than the low-dose (n = 10; 37.0%) group; difference 28.3% (95% CI: 2.5-54.2; p = 0.039), odds ratio (OR) 3.21 (95% CI: 1.04-9.88). In the DBM phase at Week 26, similar proportions of patients maintained clinical response in the low-dose (n = 23; 54.8%) and high-dose (n = 24; 53.3%) groups: OR 0.99 (0.42-2.34); p = 0.981. Overall, 246 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 73 patients (69.5%); 23 TEAEs in 14 patients (13.3%) were considered related to the study drug. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Interpretation: Our findings suggested that the benefit-risk ratio of once-daily multimatrix mesalamine in paediatric patients was favourable and comparable with that reported in adults with mild-to-moderate UC. Funding: Shire Development LLC, a Takeda company.

Indexed as

EfficacyMild-to-moderate ulcerative colitisMultimatrix mesalaminePaediatricPhase 3 studySafetyTrial

Identifiers

PMID37855022
PMCPMC10579284
OpenAlexW4387419386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.