ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2023
Multi-modal characterization of the left atrium by a fully automated integration of pre-procedural cardiac imaging and electro-anatomical mapping.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Characterization of Atrial Fibrillation: From Patient-Specific Anatomy and Electrophysiology to Standardized Atrial Mapping.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Review
- Relevance of Anatomical Significance of AV Nodal Structures within Koch's Triangle and Pyramid.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Recent highlights from theInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The combination of information obtained from pre-procedural cardiac imaging and electro-anatomical mapping (EAM) can potentially help to locate new ablation targets. In this study we developed and evaluated a fully automated technique to align left atrial (LA) anatomies obtained from CT- and MRI-scans with LA anatomies obtained from EAM. Methods: Twenty-one patients scheduled for a pulmonary vein (PV) isolation with a pre-procedural MRI were enrolled. Additionally, a recent computed tomography (CT) scan was available in 12 patients. LA anatomies were segmented from MRI-scans using ADAS-AF (Galgo Medical, Barcelona) and from the CT-scans using Slicer3D. MRI and CT anatomies were aligned with the EAM anatomy using an iterative closest plane-to-plane algorithm. Initially, the algorithm included the PVs, LA appendage and mitral valve anulus as they are the most distinctive landmarks. Subsequently, the algorithm was applied again, excluding these structures, with only three iterative steps to refine the alignment of the true LA surface. The result of the alignments was quantified by the Euclidian distance between the aligned anatomies after excluding PVs, LA appendage and mitral anulus. Results: Our algorithm successfully aligned 20/21 MRI anatomies and 11/12 CT anatomies with the corresponding EAM anatomies. The average median residual distances were 1.9 ± 0.6 mm and 2.5 ± 0.8 mm for MRI and CT anatomies respectively. The average LA surface with a residual distance less than 5.00 mm was 89 ± 9% and 89 ± 10% for MRI and CT anatomies respectively. Conclusion: An iterative closest plane-to-plane algorithm is a reliable method to automatically align pre-procedural cardiac images with anatomies acquired during ablation procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.