Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37854978›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2023

Multi-modal characterization of the left atrium by a fully automated integration of pre-procedural cardiac imaging and electro-anatomical mapping.

Ben J M Hermans, Geertruida P Bijvoet, Robert J Holtackers, Casper Mihl, Justin G L M Luermans, Bart Maesen, Kevin Vernooy, Dominik Linz, Sevasti-Maria Chaldoupi, Ulrich Schotten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Recent highlights from theInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ben J M HermansDepartment of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Geertruida P BijvoetDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Robert J HoltackersDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Casper MihlDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Justin G L M LuermansDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Bart MaesenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Kevin VernooyDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Dominik LinzDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Sevasti-Maria ChaldoupiDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Ulrich SchottenDepartment of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The combination of information obtained from pre-procedural cardiac imaging and electro-anatomical mapping (EAM) can potentially help to locate new ablation targets. In this study we developed and evaluated a fully automated technique to align left atrial (LA) anatomies obtained from CT- and MRI-scans with LA anatomies obtained from EAM. Methods: Twenty-one patients scheduled for a pulmonary vein (PV) isolation with a pre-procedural MRI were enrolled. Additionally, a recent computed tomography (CT) scan was available in 12 patients. LA anatomies were segmented from MRI-scans using ADAS-AF (Galgo Medical, Barcelona) and from the CT-scans using Slicer3D. MRI and CT anatomies were aligned with the EAM anatomy using an iterative closest plane-to-plane algorithm. Initially, the algorithm included the PVs, LA appendage and mitral valve anulus as they are the most distinctive landmarks. Subsequently, the algorithm was applied again, excluding these structures, with only three iterative steps to refine the alignment of the true LA surface. The result of the alignments was quantified by the Euclidian distance between the aligned anatomies after excluding PVs, LA appendage and mitral anulus. Results: Our algorithm successfully aligned 20/21 MRI anatomies and 11/12 CT anatomies with the corresponding EAM anatomies. The average median residual distances were 1.9 ± 0.6 mm and 2.5 ± 0.8 mm for MRI and CT anatomies respectively. The average LA surface with a residual distance less than 5.00 mm was 89 ± 9% and 89 ± 10% for MRI and CT anatomies respectively. Conclusion: An iterative closest plane-to-plane algorithm is a reliable method to automatically align pre-procedural cardiac images with anatomies acquired during ablation procedures.

Indexed as

AlignmentAtrial fibrillationclinicaltrials.gov NCT04342312ImagingIntegrationMappingNetherlands Trial Register NL7894

Identifiers

PMID37854978
PMCPMC10579959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.