ArticleOncology letters2023
Applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Gastric cancer survival prediction using artificial intelligence models based on electronic health records: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- AI Trustworthiness in the Perioperative Period for Patients with Serious Illness: Scoping Narrative Review.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2026Article
- Inflammatory marker-driven deep learning model for postoperative gastric cancer prognosis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Current Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Gastric Cancer.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Development of a dynamic prediction model with the inclusion of time-dependent inflammatory biomarker enhances recurrence prediction after curative surgery for stage II or III gastric cancer.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Predicting gastric cancer survival using machine learning: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: a narrative review.Updates in surgery · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study employed artificial intelligence (AI) machine learning technology to evaluate the prognosis of gastric cancer using blood collection data, commonly used in clinical practice and subsequently performed a stratification distinct from conventional tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification. Experiments were conducted using four machine learning methods, namely, logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GB) and deep neural network (DNN), to classify good or poor post-5-year prognosis based on clinicopathological data and post-5-year relapse occurrence. For each machine learning method, the importance was sorted in descending order (from the most to the least); the top features were used for clustering using the k-medoids method. The prediction accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) for 5-year survival were as follows: LR, 76.8% and 0.702; RF, 72.5% and 0.721; GB, 75.3% and 0.73; DNN, 76.9% and 0.682, respectively. The prediction accuracy and AUC for 5-year recurrence-free survival were as follows: LR, 85.5% and 0.692; RF, 79.0% and 0.721; GB, 80.5% and 0.718; DNN, 83.2% and 0.670. Clustering patients into three groups resulted in a stratification distinct from the TNM classification. In conclusion, AI machine learning using routine clinical data can help evaluate the prognosis of gastric cancer, with prognosis differing according to AI-identified clusters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.