ArticleJTCVS techniques2023
Virtual reality simulation as a training tool for perfusionists in extracorporeal circulation: Establishing face and content validity.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07138599 (Training Healthcare Professionals in an Artificial Intelligence Based Virtual Reality Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Simulator Versus Conventional Video Training; a Multicentre Feasibility Study and Randomised Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Training Healthcare Professionals in an Artificial Intelligence Based Virtual Reality Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Simulator Versus Conventional Video Training; a Multicentre Feasibility Study and Randomised Controlled Trial
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evolution of cardiothoracic surgery training: from apprenticeship to AI-assisted simulation.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2026Review
- Catheterization laboratories open the doors for Extended Realities-review of clinical applications in cardiology.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Congenital cardiac surgical simulation: bridging global workforce gaps and optimizing outcomes.Future cardiology · 2025Review
- Describing, Evaluating, and Exploring Barriers to Adoption of Virtual Reality: An International Modified Delphi Consensus Study Involving Clinicians, Educators, and Industry Professionals.Journal of medical extended reality · 2024Article
- Early introduction of simulation in the medical curriculum: the MedInTo perspective.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We conducted a prospective study to assess the face and content validity of a new virtual reality (VR) extracorporeal circulation simulator (ECC) developed for perfusionists to facilitate training and practice. We evaluated the opinions of students and staff members about the feasibility of the simulation. The 2 groups consisted of experts (qualified perfusionists) and novices (trainee perfusionists). Methods: Perfusionists (n = 12 experts and n = 11 trainees) received instructions on how to use the VR simulator and then proceeded to perform the start of cardiopulmonary bypass in the VR environment. Participants then completed a Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire. The questions were rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (fully disagree) to 5 (fully agree), to assess the face validity and content validity of this simulator. Results: Participants reported a predominantly positive experience with the VR-ECC simulator, with 96% (n = 22) agreeing that the simulator was a useful way of training ECC scenarios. All participants found it easy to interact with the software (100%, n = 23), and 82% of students (n = 9) believed it helped them remember the steps involved with initiating ECC. Finally, (87% [n = 20]) of participants believed the image quality and depth perception were good. Conclusions: Our next-generation simulator was valid for face and content constructs, and almost all participants found it to be a useful way of training for ECC scenarios. This simulator represents a first step toward truly blended digital learning and a new interactive, flexible, and innovative modality for perfusion training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.