ArticleCureus2023
Telemedicine Breastfeeding Consultation: The Saudi Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital resources and interactive multimedia tools for breastfeeding promotion and support: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Prevalence and predictors of breastfeeding practices in Saudi Arabia: a national cross-sectional study based on the 2021 WHO breastfeeding indicators.International breastfeeding journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Telemedicine is widely used in health specialties. Yet, the experience of telemedicine use and its effectiveness in breastfeeding support is a research gap. The purpose of this study was to describe the pattern of telemedicine use for breastfeeding support in Saudi Arabia and to explore patients' satisfaction with the service. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in outpatient settings at Ministry of Health facilities in several Saudi regions. The number of breastfeeding consultations over one year (2021) was analyzed in terms of region, month, method of consultation, and women's maternity status. Data on patient satisfaction and telemedicine techniques were gathered during 2022. Results Across the 16 regions enrolled in the project, 51,571 remote breastfeeding consultations were conducted, representing 28.2% of the total consultations. The eastern region reported the highest percentage (40.7%), and the southern region reported the lowest (2.4%). Almost two-thirds of the consultations were provided to lactating mothers (62.91%). Most data (90%) were collected from breastfeeding clinics in hospitals, and nurses were the main primary health care providers. The mean was 4,255 consultations per month. In terms of technology, telemedicine consultations were mostly conducted by phone (50%) and WhatsApp (38%). Satisfaction with telemedicine was reported by 80% of the participants, with a statistical difference found in those favoring telemedicine over in-person care (p=0.032), particularly for those using phone consultations and Telegram (p<0.001). WhatsApp respondents had the commonest neutral responses (p<0.001). Conclusion Telemedicine breastfeeding care has been widely established with high patient satisfaction. A national protocol outpatient lactation services with an intergrated hospital and primary care services and involvement of different health care professionals are recommended. Although breastfeeding counselling is proven to have a positive change on breastfeeding indicators, telemedicine tool per se needs further work on its role in breastfeeding indicators. Triage of cases to be evaluated face-to-face or referral to a specialist after telemedicine lactation care is an area for future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.