Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37854684›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Clinical outcomes after online adaptive MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for pancreatic tumors on a 1.5 T MR-linac.

Hidde Eijkelenkamp, Guus Grimbergen, Lois A Daamen, Hanne D Heerkens, Saskia van de Ven, Stella Mook, Gert J Meijer, Izaak Q Molenaar, Hjalmar C van Santvoort, Eric Paulson and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04075305 (The Multiple Outcome Evaluation of Radiation Therapy Using the MR-Linac Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04075305 recruitingnot on this map

The Multiple Outcome Evaluation of Radiation Therapy Using the MR-Linac Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUMC UtrechtRan2019 to 2030Enrolled8,000ConditionsOncology, Breast Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Gynecologic CancerArmsRadiation therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Training for tomorrow: Establishing a worldwide curriculum in online adaptive radiation therapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hidde EijkelenkampDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Guus GrimbergenDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Lois A DaamenDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Hanne D HeerkensDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Saskia van de VenDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Stella MookDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Gert J MeijerDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Izaak Q MolenaarDepartment of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Hjalmar C van SantvoortDepartment of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Eric PaulsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Beth Ann EricksonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Helena M VerkooijenDivision of Imaging, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
William Adrian HallDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Martijn P W IntvenDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLMedical College of Wisconsin · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is a promising treatment modality for pancreatic cancer and is being employed by an increasing number of centers worldwide. However, clinical outcomes have only been reported on a small scale, often from single institutes and in the context of clinical trials, in which strict patient selection might limit generalizability of outcomes. This study presents clinical outcomes of a large, international cohort of patients with (peri)pancreatic tumors treated with online adaptive MRgRT. Methods: We evaluated clinical outcomes and treatment details of patients with (peri)pancreatic tumors treated on a 1.5 Tesla (T) MR-linac in two large-volume treatment centers participating in the prospective MOMENTUM cohort (NCT04075305). Treatments were evaluated through schematics, dosage, delivery strategies, and success rates. Acute toxicity was assessed until 3 months after MRgRT started, and late toxicity from 3-12 months of follow-up (FU). The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) at baseline and 3 months of FU. Furthermore, we used the Kaplan-Meier analysis to calculate the cumulative overall survival. Results: A total of 80 patients were assessed with a median FU of 8 months (range 1-39 months). There were 34 patients who had an unresectable primary tumor or were medically inoperable, 29 who had an isolated local recurrence, and 17 who had an oligometastasis. A total of 357 of the 358 fractions from all hypofractionated schemes were delivered as planned. Grade 3-4 acute toxicity occurred in 3 of 59 patients (5%) with hypofractionated MRgRT and grade 3-4 late toxicity in 5 of 41 patients (12%). Six patients died within 3 months after MRgRT; in one of these patients, RT attribution could not be ruled out as cause of death. The QLQ-C30 global health status remained stable from baseline to 3 months FU (70.5 at baseline, median change of +2.7 [P = 0.5]). The 1-year cumulative overall survival for the entire cohort was 67%, and that for the primary tumor group was 66%. Conclusion: Online adaptive MRgRT for (peri)pancreatic tumors on a 1.5 T MR-Linac could be delivered as planned, with low numbers of missed fractions. In addition, treatments were associated with limited grade 3-4 toxicity and a stable QoL at 3 months of FU.

Indexed as

clinical outcomesMRgRTpancreatic cancerquality of lifetoxicity

Identifiers

PMID37854684
PMCPMC10579578
OpenAlexW4387303723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.