Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37854671›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2023

Contouring of emerging organs-at-risk (OARS) of the female pelvis and interobserver variability: A study by the Italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology (AIRO).

A Augurio, G Macchia, L Caravatta, M Lucarelli, F Di Gugliemo, A Vinciguerra, B Seccia, V De Sanctis, R Autorino, C Delle Curti and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Experience and uncertainty analysis of CT-based adaptive radiotherapy for abdominal treatments.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

A AugurioDepartment of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Via Dei Vestini, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
G MacchiaRadiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 1, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
L CaravattaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Via Dei Vestini, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
M LucarelliDepartment od Radiotion Oncology, SS Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University, Via dei Vestini, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
F Di GugliemoDepartment od Radiotion Oncology, SS Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University, Via dei Vestini, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
A VinciguerraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Via Dei Vestini, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
B SecciaDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University, Via Luigi Polacchi 11, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
V De SanctisRadiotherapy Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, S. Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189 Rome, Italy.
R AutorinoOncological Radiotherapy Unit, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Moscati, 31, 00168 Rome, Italy.
C Delle CurtiRadioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione IRCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Via Giacomo Venezian, 1, 20133 Milano, Italy.
S MeregalliRadiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo, Via G. B. Pergolesi, 33, 20900 Monza, Italy.
E PerrucciRadiation Oncology Section, Perugia General Hospital, Piazzale Giorgio Menghini, 3, 06129 Perugia, Italy.
D RaspantiTemasinergie S.p.A., Via Marcello Malpighi 120, Faenza, Italy.
A CerrottaRadioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione IRCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Via Giacomo Venezian, 1, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Ospedale SS. Annunziata · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To provide straightforward instructions for daily practice in delineating emerging organs-at-risk (OARs) of the female pelvis and to discuss the interobserver variability in a two-step multicenter study. Methods and materials: A contouring atlas with anatomical boundaries for each emerging OAR was realized by radiation oncologists and radiologists who are experts in pelvic imaging, as per their knowledge and clinical practice. These contours were identified as quality benchmarks for the analysis subsequently carried out. Radiation oncologists not involved in setting the custom-built contouring atlas and interested in the treatment of gynecological cancer were invited to participate in this 2-step trial. In the first step all participants were supplied with a selected clinical case of locally advanced cervical cancer and had to identify emerging OARs (Levator ani muscle; Puborectalis muscle; Internal anal sphincter; External anal sphincter; Bladder base and trigone; Bladder neck; Iliac Bone Marrow; Lower Pelvis Bone Marrow; Lumbosacral Bone Marrow) based on their own personal knowledge of pelvic anatomy and experience. The suggested OARs and the contouring process were then presented at a subsequent webinar meeting with a contouring laboratory. Finally, in the second step, after the webinar meeting, each participant who had joined the study but was not involved in setting the benchmark received the custom-built contouring atlas with anatomical boundaries and was requested to delineate again the OARs using the tool provided. The Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and the Jaccard Similarity Coefficient (JSC) were used to evaluate the spatial overlap accuracy of the different volume delineations and compared with the benchmark; the Hausdorff distance (HD) and the mean distance to agreement (MDA) to explore the distance between contours. All the results were reported as sample mean and standard deviation (SD). Results: Fifteen radiation oncologists from different Institutions joined the study. The participants had a high agreement degree for pelvic bones sub-structures delineation according to DICE (IBM: 0.9 ± 0.02; LPBM: 0.91 ± 0.01). A moderate degree according to DICE was showed for ovaries (Right: 0.61 ± 0.16, Left: 0.72 ± 0.05), vagina (0.575 ± 0.13), bladder sub-structures (0.515 ± 0.08) and EAS (0.605 ± 0.05), whereas a low degree for the other sub-structures of the anal-rectal sphincter complex (LAM: 0.345 ± 0.07, PRM: 0.41 ± 0.10, and IAS: 0.4 ± 0.07). Conclusion: This study found a moderate to low level of agreement in the delineation of the female pelvis emerging OARs, with a high degree of variability among observers. The development of delineation tools should be encouraged to improve the routine contouring of these OARs and increase the quality and consistency of radiotherapy planning.

Indexed as

Contouring atlasEmerging female pelvic OARsGynecological cancerInterobserver variabilityRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37854671
PMCPMC10579954
OpenAlexW4387394356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.