ArticleBiomedical optics express2023
Photoacoustic tomography as a method to estimate the optical fluence distribution in turbid media.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, there are no non-invasive experimental methods available for measuring optical fluence distributions in tissue. We present photoacoustic tomography (PAT) as a method to approximate the relative optical fluence distribution in a homogeneous optically scattering medium. Three-dimensional photoacoustic images were captured with a near-full view PAT scanner in phantoms with known optical absorption and scatter properties. Resultant 3D PAT images were compared to the expected optical fluence distributions from Monte Carlo simulations and diffusion theory using volumetric and shape analysis. Volumetric analysis of PAT images compared well with the optical fluence distributions from simulation. Dice similarity coefficients ranged from 51 to 82%. The reduced scattering coefficient estimated from PAT images compared well to estimates from simulations for values below 0.5 mm
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.