Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37854420›Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2023

Intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to enable recovery for people with severe mental illness in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.

André J van Rensburg, Carrie Brooke-Sumner

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. COVID-19 experience of people with severe mental health conditions and families in South Africa.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

André J van RensburgCentre for Rural Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-2232
Carrie Brooke-SumnerAlcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9489-8717

Funding

Southern African Research Consortium for Mental health INTegration (S-MhINT)-Research and capacity building consortium to strengthen mental health integration in South Africa, Mozambique and Tanzania.U19MH113191 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI BHANA, ARVIN, PETERSEN, INGE · 2017 to 2022
$3.1M
FEASIBILITY AND ACCEPTABILITY OF CRITICAL TIME INTERVENTION TO SUPPORT PEOPLE WITH SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS FOLLOWING POST-ACUTE HOSPITAL DISCHARGE IN SOUTH AFRICAR34MH131233 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI BHANA, ARVIN, JANSE VAN RENSBURG, ANDRÉ · 2022 to 2024
$514k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH131233NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH113191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The needs of people with severe mental illness are complex and require a range of services embedded in well-coordinated systems of care to enable recovery, promote well-being and optimise social integration. The concept of recovery is strongly rooted in the centrality of multi and intersectoral systems of care, and, while multi and -intersectoral dimensions of mental health systems have been highlighted in analyses focusing on high-income regions, little has been elaborated in terms of these approaches in the recovery of people with severe mental illness (SMI) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The aim of this review was to identify and describe multi and intersectoral approaches underpinning community-based SMI recovery interventions in LMICs. A scoping review was carried out following the following steps: (1) Objectives for the review were developed and refined; (2) A systematic search of databases (EbscoHost, PubMed, Google Scholar) and previous reviews were undertaken from 2012 to 2022, where relevant papers were identified; (3) Papers with a focus on SMI and recovery, a specific description of an intervention, located in LMICs, with explicit linkages between sectors, and published in English, were selected for inclusion; (4) Data were extracted and charted and (5) Findings were analysed and reported thematically. Thirty-six papers were included for analysis, from 18 countries, including qualitative studies, trials, desktop and secondary data reviews and case studies. Examples of multi- and intersectoral action included collaboration between healthcare and community support systems, collaboration in providing supported housing and supportive community spaces for recovery, and linkages between biomedical and social spheres of care. Barriers included the dominance of mental health professions in delivering care, community-based stigmatising attitudes towards SMI. Multi- and intersectoral collaboration for SMI recovery requires investments in financing, education and coordination by a governing body.

Indexed as

collaborative carecommunity-based initiativesdeveloping countriesrecoverysevere mental illness

Identifiers

PMID37854420
PMCPMC10579663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.