Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37854414›Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2023

Potential mechanisms by which cash transfer programmes could improve the mental health and life chances of young people: A conceptual framework and lines of enquiry for research and policy.

Sara Evans-Lacko, Ricardo Araya, Annette Bauer, Emily Garman, Alejandra Álvarez-Iglesias, David McDaid, Philipp Hessel, Alicia Matijasevich, Cristiane Silvestre Paula, A-La Park and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sara Evans-LackoDepartment of Health Policy, Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4691-2630
Ricardo ArayaCentre for Global Mental Health, Health Service & Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Annette BauerDepartment of Health Policy, Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Emily GarmanAlan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Alejandra Álvarez-IglesiasDepartment of Health Policy, Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
David McDaidDepartment of Health Policy, Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0744-2664
Philipp HesselEscuela de Gobierno Alberto Lleras Camargo, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Alicia MatijasevichDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.
Cristiane Silvestre PaulaCentro Mackenzie de Pesquisa sobre Infância e Adolescência, Programa de Pós-graduação em Distúrbios do Desenvolvimento, Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, São Paulo, Brazil.
A-La ParkDepartment of Health Policy, Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Crick LundCentre for Global Mental Health, Health Service & Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health is inextricably linked to both poverty and future life chances such as education, skills, labour market attachment and social function. Poverty can lead to poorer mental health, which reduces opportunities and increases the risk of lifetime poverty. Cash transfer programmes are one of the most common strategies to reduce poverty and now reach substantial proportions of populations living in low- and middle-income countries. Because of their rapid expansion in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, they have recently gained even more importance. Recently, there have been suggestions that these cash transfers might improve youth mental health, disrupting the cycle of disadvantage at a critical period of life. Here, we present a conceptual framework describing potential mechanisms by which cash transfer programmes could improve the mental health and life chances of young people. Furthermore, we explore how theories from behavioural economics and cognitive psychology could be used to more specifically target these mechanisms and optimise the impact of cash transfers on youth mental health and life chances. Based on this, we identify several lines of enquiry and action for future research and policy.

Indexed as

cash transfer programmeschildren and adolescentsmental healthpovertysocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID37854414
PMCPMC10579689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.