Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37854412›Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2023

Facilitators and barriers to implementation of suicide prevention interventions: Scoping review.

Alexandr Kasal, Roksana Táborská, Laura Juríková, Alexander Grabenhofer-Eggerth, Michaela Pichler, Beate Gruber, Hana Tomášková, Thomas Niederkrotenthaler

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Sociology of Suicide After COVID-19: Assessment of the Spanish Case.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Mixed-Methods Evaluation to Inform the Hawai'i Suicide Prevention Strategic Plan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexandr KasalDepartment of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9877-5706
Roksana TáborskáDepartment of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.
Laura JuríkováDepartment of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.
Alexander Grabenhofer-EggerthDepartment of Psychosocial Health, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH, Wien, Austria.
Michaela PichlerDepartment of Psychosocial Health, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH, Wien, Austria.
Beate GruberDepartment of Psychosocial Health, Gesundheit Österreich GmbH, Wien, Austria.
Hana TomáškováDepartment of Public Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.
Thomas NiederkrotenthalerCenter for Public Health, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Wien, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We know that suicide is preventable, yet hundreds of thousands of people still die due to suicide every year. Many interventions were proven to be effective, and dozens of others showed promising results. However, translating these interventions into new settings brings several challenges. One of the crucial obstacles to success is not anticipating possible barriers to implementation nor enhancing possible benefits of factors facilitating the implementation. While we witnessed great support for suicide prevention activities globally in the past years, implementation barriers and facilitating factors are yet to be comprehensively mapped to help implementation activities worldwide. This scoping review maps current knowledge on facilitators and barriers to the implementation of suicide prevention interventions while using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) for classification. We included 64 studies. Barriers and facilitators were most commonly identified in the outer setting CFIR domain, namely in the sub-domain of patient needs and resources, which refers to the way in which these needs and resources are reflected by the reviewed interventions. The second most saturated CFIR domain for facilitators was intervention characteristics, where relative advantage, adaptability and cost of intervention sub-domains were equally represented. These sub-domains refer mostly to how the intervention is perceived by key stakeholders, to what extent it can be tailored to the implementation context and how much it costs. While intervention characteristics domain was the second most common also for barriers, the complexity sub-domain referring to high perceived difficulty of implementation was the most frequently represented. With reference to the results, we recommend adapting interventions to the needs of the target groups. Furthermore, carefully selecting the intervention to suit the target context concerning their adaptability, costs and complexity is vital for a successful implementation. Further implications for practice and research are discussed.

Indexed as

barriersfacilitatorsimplementationinterventionsself-harmsuicide

Identifiers

PMID37854412
PMCPMC10579684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.