Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37854390›Full record

ReviewGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2023

Safe and valid? A systematic review of the psychometric properties of culturally adapted depression scales for use among Indigenous populations.

Michelle Yang, Quinta Seon, Liliana Gomez Cardona, Maharshee Karia, Gajanan Velupillai, Valérie Noel, Outi Linnaranta

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michelle YangÉcole interdisciplinaire des sciences de la santé/Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, Université d'Ottawa/University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Quinta SeonDepartment of Psychiatry, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Liliana Gomez CardonaDepartment of Psychiatry, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Maharshee KariaDepartment of Psychiatry, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Gajanan VelupillaiDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Valérie NoelDepartment of Psychiatry, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Outi LinnarantaDepartment of Psychiatry, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0383-7215
Douglas Mental Health University Institute · CADouglas College · CAMcGill University · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Implementing culturally sensitive psychometric measures of depression may be an effective strategy to improve acceptance, response rate, and reliability of psychological assessment among Indigenous populations. However, the psychometric properties of depression scales after cultural adaptation remain unclear. Methods: We screened the Ovid Medline, PubMed, Embase, Global Health, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases through three levels of search terms: Depression, Psychometrics, and Indigenous, following the PRISMA guidelines. We assessed metrics for reliability (including Cronbach's alpha), validity (including fit indices), and clinical utility (including predictive value). Results: Across 31 studies included the review, 13 different depression scales were adapted through language or content modification. Sample populations included Indigenous from the Americas, Asia, Africa, and Oceania. Most cultural adaptations had strong psychometric properties; however, few and inconsistent properties were reported. Where available, alphas, inter-rater and test-retest reliability, construct validity, and incremental validity often indicated increased cultural sensitivity of adapted scales. There were mixed results for clinical utility, criterion validity, cross-cultural validity, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, predictive value, and likelihood ratio. Conclusions: Modifications to increase cultural relevance have the potential to improve fit and acceptance of a scale by the Indigenous population, however, these changes may decrease specificity and negative predictive value. There is an urgent need for suitable tools that are useful and reliable for identifying Indigenous individuals for clinical treatment of depression. This awaits future work for optimal specificity and validated cut-off points that take into account the high prevalence of depression in these populations.

Indexed as

clinical utilityIndigenouspsychometricsreliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID37854390
PMCPMC10579654
OpenAlexW4386697467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.