Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37854370›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2023

Agreement of intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST, non-contact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in children with ocular hypertension and related factors.

Hou-Gang Li, Yan-Hui Chen, Fang Lin, Si-Yu Li, Qing-Hua Liu, Chun-Ge Yin, Xi-Yue Chen, Xin-Jie Zhang, Yue Qu, Yan-Nian Hui

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hou-Gang LiOphthalmic Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan 063000, Hebei Province, China.
Yan-Hui ChenOphthalmic Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan 063000, Hebei Province, China.
Fang LinTianjin Jizhou District Tianyi Vision Hospital, Tianjin 300070, China.
Si-Yu LiOphthalmic Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan 063000, Hebei Province, China.
Qing-Hua LiuOphthalmic Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan 063000, Hebei Province, China.
Chun-Ge YinOphthalmic Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan 063000, Hebei Province, China.
Xi-Yue ChenOphthalmic Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan 063000, Hebei Province, China.
Xin-Jie ZhangOphthalmic Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan 063000, Hebei Province, China.
Yue QuOphthalmic Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan 063000, Hebei Province, China.
Yan-Nian HuiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710023, Shaanxi Province, China.
Air Force Medical University · CNTianjin Tianhe Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo access the agreement of intraocular pressure (IOP) values obtained from biomechanically corrected tonometer [Corvis ST (CST)], non-contact tonometer (NCT), and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) in children with NCT measured-IOP (NCT-IOP) values of 22 mm Hg or more, and related factors.

methodsA total of 51 eyes with NCT-IOP≥22 mm Hg in children aged 7 to 14y were examined and IOP was measured by CST, NCT, and GAT. Based on GAT measured IOP (GAT-IOP), ocular hypertension (OHT) group (≥22 mm Hg, 24 eyes) and the non-OHT group (<22 mm Hg, 27 eyes) were defined. We compared the agreement of the three measurements,

resultsCompared with the OHT group, thicker CCT, larger rim volume, and higher differences between NCT-IOP and GAT-IOP, were found in the non-OHT group. The differences between CST-IOP and GAT-IOP were lower than the differences between NCT-IOP and GAT-IOP in both groups. The mean differences in CST-IOP and GAT-IOP were 1.26 mm Hg (95% limit of agreement ranged from 0.1 to 2.41 mm Hg, OHT group) and 1.20 mm Hg (95% limit of agreement ranged from -0.5 to 3.00 mm Hg, non-OHT group), and the mean differences in NCT and GAT were 3.90 mm Hg (95% limit of agreement ranged from -0.19 to 9.70 mm Hg, OHT group) and 6.00 mm Hg (95% limit of agreement ranged from 1.50 to 10.50 mm Hg, non-OHT group). The differences between CST-IOP and GAT-IOP were not related to CCT, age, and AL in both groups; while the differences between NCT-IOP and GAT-IOP were related to CCT in the OHT group (

conclusionThe accuracy of NCT in the diagnosis of pediatric OHT is low. The agreement of CST-IOP and GAT-IOP was significantly higher in children with and without OHT than in those with NCT-IOP and GAT-IOP. Therefore, CST can be used as a good alternative for IOP measurement in children. The impacts of CCT and AL on NCT measurement need to be fully considered when managing childhood IOP.

Indexed as

axial lengthcentral corneal thicknesschildrencorneal biomechanicsCorvis STGoldmann applanation tonometernon-contact tonometerocular hypertension

Identifiers

PMID37854370
PMCPMC10559031
OpenAlexW4386922591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.