Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37854332›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

Karin Schwaiger, Julia Storch, Christoph Bauer, Johann Bauer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Comparative Genomics ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  3. Detection of drug resistance inFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Karin SchwaigerInstitute for Food Safety, Food Technology and Veterinary Public Health, Unit of Food Hygiene and Technology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Julia StorchVeterinary Office Landratsamt Fürstenfeldbruck, Fürstenfeldbruck, Germany.
Christoph BauerDepartment of Quality Assurance and Analytics, Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, Freising, Germany.
Johann BauerChair of Animal Hygiene, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diarrhea in newborn calves is considered life-threatening and results in large economic losses in dairy farms. Lactobacilli generally play an important role in intestinal health, and Objective: These studies were designed to demonstrate whether oral administration of preselected Microorganisms: 46 Animals: 170 newborn calves of Simmental breed of 10 dairy farms in Bavaria (Germany), were included in the study; of 166 animals the data could be evaluated. Methods: Microbiological (antibiotic sensitivity test, acid and bile salt stability test, antimicrobial activity of the supernatants), molecular biological (PCR, RAPD-PCR) and toxicological methods (MTT test) were used to select and to characterize suitable Results: Out of 46 Conclusion:

Indexed as

calfdiarrheaLactobacillusLimosilactobacillusprotectionreuteri

Identifiers

PMID37854332
PMCPMC10579909
OpenAlexW4387309975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.