ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2023
Approaches for Three Material Decomposition using a Triple-Layer Flat-Panel Detector.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel High-Atomic-Number Element and Nanoparticle-Based CT Contrast Agents: Advanced Design Strategies and Clinical Translational Barriers.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Joint Temporal and Spectral Processing for Improved Digital Subtraction Angiography Using Photon-Counting Detectors.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025Article
- Joint Temporal and Spectral Processing for Improved Digital Subtraction Angiography Using Photon-Counting Detectors.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025Article
- Performance of Dual-Layer Flat-Panel Detectors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Efficient spectral data reduction for accurate iodine quantification in multi-energy CT.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Design Optimization of A Triple-Layer Flat-Panel Detector for Three-Material Decomposition.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
X-ray spectral imaging has been increasingly investigated in radiography and interventional imaging. Flat-panel detectors with more than one detection layer have demonstrated advantages in providing separate soft tissue and bone images. Current dual-layer flat-panel detectors (DL-FPD) have limited capability to further differentiate between iodinated contrast agent and bony/calcified structures. In this work, we investigate a triple-layer flat-panel detector (TL-FPD) and the feasibility of three-material (water/calcium/iodine) decomposition. A physical model of TL-FPD, including system geometry, spectrum sensitivities, blur and noise models was developed. Using simulated triple-layer projections, three-material decompositions were performed using three different processing methods: polynomial-based, model-based, and a machine learning-based method (ResUnet). We find that the polynomial-based method leads to very noisy images with poor differentiation between calcium and iodine maps. The model-based method achieved much lower noise levels than the polynomial-based method but exhibited residual errors between the iodine and calcium channels. The ResUnet method offered the best decompositions among the investigated methods in terms of root mean square error from the ground truth and noise in the material maps. These preliminary results demonstrate the feasibility of three-material decomposition using TL-FPD and suggest a path for clinical translation of single-shot contrast/iodine differentiation in radiography and fluoroscopy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.