Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37854278›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development

Call for Action: Undergraduate Medical Education Assessment-Advocating for a Transition From Tiered to Competency-Based Grading.

Cynthia Abraham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Cynthia AbrahamIcahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, undergraduate medical education (UME) grading has been based on a tiered system. Tier-based grading can cause anxiety as medical students are compared to their peers. Students then become overly driven by the pursuit of creating favorable impressions by supervisors as well as by high grades. Additionally, the emphasis on normative parameters appears to misalign with the goal of UME which is to not sort learners into different residency programs but to train future doctors to meet the needs of society. This commentary is a call for action to shift from utilizing a normative-based grading paradigm in UME to implementing one in which learners are being assessed on their ability to attain specific competencies. It is important that UME transitions to competency-based assessments as the graduate medical education (GME) realm has already adopted this framework.

Indexed as

competencygradingundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID37854278
PMCPMC10580707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.