ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Outcome of management based on "1+X" model in a health examination center.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effect of management measures based on the "1+X" model in physical examination centers.
methodsThis retrospective study was conducted on 5362 individuals who underwent physical examinations in Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022. These subjects were divided into an observation group (n=2681) and a control group (n=2681) according to the different management measures. Subjects from the control group were given routine management measures, while those from the observation group were given management measures based on the "1+X" model. The scores of negative emotions, waiting time for physical examination, acquisition of health knowledge, satisfaction for the physical examinations, and efficiency and degree of credibility in medical management were evaluated and compared between the two groups.
resultsAfter management, the scores of anxiety and depression in both groups were significantly reduced in contrast to before management, and the two scores were significantly lower in the observation group than those in the control group (P<0.05). The observation group experienced significantly shorter waiting time for routine urination, blood sampling, internal and surgical examinations, and electrocardiogram than the control group (all P<0.001). The acquisition of health knowledge in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group (P<0.05). The satisfaction rates of the observation group in the terms of service attitude, examination environment, health education, and follow-up services were significantly better than those in the control group (all P<0.05). Moreover, the efficiency and degree of credibility in medical management in the observation group were better than those in the control group.
conclusionThe application of management measures based on the "1+X" model has a good effect in our physical examination center. On the one hand, it can significantly reduce the waiting time for various physical examinations and alleviate the negative emotions of physical examinees. On the other hand, it can effectively enhance the overall acquisition of health knowledge, the satisfaction of physical examination, and the efficiency and degree of credibility in medical management. This management model is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37854228PMC10579014W4387764628What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.