ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Comparative analysis of ankle injury kinematics and dynamics in basketball players: forefoot landing vs. rearfoot landing modes.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of Different Degrees of Ankle Dorsiflexion Restriction on the Biomechanics of the Lower Extremity in Stop-Jumping.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the differences in ankle joint parameters of basketball athletes between the forefoot and rearfoot landing and to investigate the injury mechanism of ankle joints in different landing modes.
methodsTwenty level II male basketball athletes were selected as subjects in this study. The landing movements of these athletes were assigned into a forefoot landing mode and a rearfoot landing mode. The former includes movements such as running emergency stop, two-leg jump and forefoot landing, while the latter includes actions such as running emergency stop, two-leg jump and rearfoot landing. The motion capture system and three-dimensional force measuring table were used for collecting the kinematic and dynamic data of the subjects.
resultsThe initial landing angles, including ankle dorsiflexion and medial ankle rotation of the forefoot were larger than those of the rearfoot (all P<0.05). Compared to those in the rearfoot landing mode, the forefoot landing exhibited a greater peak angle of ankle plantar flexion and ankle varus, as well as a smaller peak angle of ankle dorsiflexion and ankle internal rotation (all P<0.05). In comparison to the rearfoot landing mode, the forefoot landing showed a larger range of ankle varus and valgus, as well as a smaller range of ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion (all P<0.05). The ankle plantar flexion torque of forefoot landing was higher than that of rearfoot landing, while the peak ankle dorsiflexion torque of forefoot landing was smaller than that of rearfoot landing (all P<0.05). Compared to those in the rearfoot landing mode, the outward peak ground reaction force was smaller and the forward peak ground reaction was larger in forefoot landing mode (all P<0.05). No obvious differences were observed in other indicators between two landing modes.
conclusionsThere are kinematic and dynamic differences between the forefoot and rearfoot landing. Forefoot landing may increase the risk of ankle injury during landing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37854222PMC10579024W4387764563What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.