ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Clinical application of double-capsule fecal catheter device in ICU patients with fecal incontinence.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore and analyze the clinical effect and potential value of a double-capsule fecal catheter device in patients with fecal incontinence in the intensive care unit (ICU).
methodsA total of 107 patients with fecal incontinence who were admitted to the ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University from May 2017 to April 2023 were selected and randomly divided into the observation group and the control group, with 68 cases in the observation group and 39 cases in the control group. The observation group was given a double-capsule fecal catheter device, and the control group was given an ordinary fecal catheter device for drainage. The clinical baseline data, adverse events, skin conditions, changes of patients' quality of life (QoL), indicators from laboratory test, working pressure and burden of nursing, average length of stay (ALOS) and prognosis of patients were compared between the two groups.
resultsThere was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), hypertension history, diabetes mellitus history and smoking history between the observation group and the control group (all
conclusionThe application of the novel double-capsule fecal catheter device can reduce the adverse events and working pressure and burden of nursing, it also improved skin condition and patients' QoL. Correspondingly, it improved relevant prognostic indicators during the patient's hospitalization. It has beneficial clinical practicability and popularity for fecal incontinence in patients, and it is worthy of use and promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37854203PMC10579000W4387764405What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.