ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Prognostic biomarkers for sepsis mortality based on the literature and LC-MS-based metabolomics of sepsis patients.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolic footprint of sepsis and septic shock: A narrative review.World journal of critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota dysbiosis in sepsis: mechanisms and the gut-organ axis with a focus on lung and brain interactions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Integration of Network Pharmacology, Transcriptomics, and Metabolomics Strategies to Uncover the Mechanism of Chaihuang Qingfu Pill in Treating Sepsis-Induced Liver Injury.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe management of sepsis, a potentially lethal overreaction to infection, is limited by the lack of prognostic tools to guide its treatment. Our aim is to identify a novel metabolic biomarker panel for predicting sepsis mortality based on a literature review and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based metabolomics.
methodsIn the literature, we found metabolomics biomarkers reported to predict sepsis mortality. We determined the classifications, reported frequency, and KEGG pathway enrichment of these markers. Using serum samples from 20 sepsis survivors and 20 non-survivors within 28 days after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), we performed LC-MS-based metabolomics. Based on the literature review and metabolomics, a prognostic biomarker panel for sepsis was identified and its area under the curve (AUC) values was assessed.
resultsKynurenate, caffeine, and lysoPC 22:4 were selected as a prognostic biomarker panel for sepsis. The panel had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.885 (95% CI, 0.694-1) evaluated by linear support vector machine (SVM) and 0.849 (0.699-1) by random forest (RF), which was higher than that of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA). A combination of kynurenate, caffeine, and lysoPC 22:4 and SOFA provided the best discriminating performance, with AUCs of 0.961 (0.878-1) for SVM and 0.916 (0.774-1) for RF.
conclusionsThe prognostic biomarker panel consisting of kynurenate, caffeine, and lysoPC 22:4 may aid in the identification of sepsis patients at a high risk of death, leading to personalized therapy in clinical practice that will improve sepsis survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37854200PMC10579003W4387765225What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.