ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Laparoscopy and laparotomy for patients with transverse colon cancer: comparative analysis of short-term surgical outcomes.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the efficacy of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the treatment of transverse colon cancer.
methodsData from 100 patients with transverse colon cancer treated in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. According to the treatment methods, these patients were assigned into two groups: a laparotomy group (n=50) and a laparoscopy group (n=50). The intraoperative parameters, postoperative recovery, incidences of complications, postoperative pain, quality of life (QoL) score, postoperative serum inflammatory cytokine (hs-CRP, TNF-α, and IL-6) levels, and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were analyzed and compared between the two groups.
resultsThere was no significant difference in number of resected lymph nodes between the two groups. The operation time and intraoperative bleeding in the laparoscopy group were significantly less than those in the laparotomy group (P<0.05). The hospital stay, duration of gastrointestinal function recovery, and time of first postoperative flatus in the laparoscopy group were significantly shorter than those in the laparotomy group (all P<0.001). Moreover, the incidence of overall complications in the laparoscopy group was significantly lower than that in the laparotomy group (P<0.05). Compared with those in the laparotomy group, the VAS score was obviously lower and the QoL score was significantly higher in the laparoscopy group (all P<0.001). Patients in the laparoscopy group exhibited lower levels of postoperative hs-CRP, TNF-α and IL-6 in contrast to those in the laparotomy group (P<0.05). In additional, there was no significant difference in the PNI level before surgery between two groups. After surgery, the PNI level in the laparoscopy group was obviously higher than that in the laparotomy group (P<0.001).
conclusionLaparoscopy is superior to laparotomy in treatment of transverse colon cancer through achieving better intraoperative outcomes, promoting postoperative recovery, reducing the incidence of complications and inflammatory reactions, alleviating postoperative pain, and improving therapeutic effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37854199PMC10579031W4387765316What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.