Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37854116›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023

Effects of different grassland utilization methods on the germinable soil seed bank of the Hulunbuir meadow steppe.

Ruirui Yan, Tianqi Yu, Hongmei Liu, Shijie Lv, Baorui Chen, Yanling Wu, Guoping Que, Zhijun Wei, Lijun Xu, Xiaoyu Zhu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ruirui YanHulunber Grassland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station/State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, the Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Tianqi YuHulunber Grassland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station/State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, the Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hongmei LiuGrassland Institute of Inner Mongolia Academy of Forestry Sciences, Inner Mongolia, Hohhot, China.
Shijie LvCollege of Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Inner Mongolia, Hohhot, China.
Baorui ChenHulunber Grassland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station/State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, the Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yanling WuCollege of Life Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Inner Mongolia, Hohhot, China.
Guoping QueCollege of Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Inner Mongolia, Hohhot, China.
Zhijun WeiCollege of Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Inner Mongolia, Hohhot, China.
Lijun XuHulunber Grassland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station/State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, the Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyu ZhuAgro-Environmental Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tianjin, China.
Guixia YangHulunber Grassland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station/State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, the Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaoping XinHulunber Grassland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station/State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, the Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning · CNInner Mongolia Agricultural University · CNAgro-Environmental Protection Institute · CNInner Mongolia Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seed banks are crucial regenerative resources for aboveground vegetation. The pattern of their changes holds immense significance in understanding alterations in the belowground seed bank. This understanding is pivotal for uncovering both short-term and long-term shifts in plant communities. Additionally, it contributes to the restoration of grassland ecosystems. To better protect grassland biodiversity and provide a theoretical basis for the restoration of degraded grasslands, in this study, the germination characteristics of soil seed banks in free-grazed, enclosed and mown areas were compared, and the results were combined with those of previous studies for a comprehensive analysis. The density of soil seed bank and perennial forage soil seed bank were significantly affected by different grassland utilization and soil depths. Grazing and enclosure grassland utilization methods increased the content of the soil seed bank, and mowing reduced the content of the seed bank. The soil seed bank density of perennial grasses accounted for the highest proportion under grazing, followed by mowing, and its lowest proportion was observed in the enclosures. Grazing not only facilitated the germination of the perennial grass seed bank but also substantially augmented its content. Mowing inhibited the germination of the upper growth grasses seed bank, which was particularly significant in the 0-2 cm soil layer under grazing. The content of the upper growth grasses seed bank affected the total seed bank to a certain extent, mainly in the 5-10 cm layer. The general correlations among the perennial grasses, upper growth grasses and soil germination seed bank resulted in 84.58% information extraction, and this information has practical significance for grassland ecological restoration.

Indexed as

grassland utilizationhulunbuir grasslandperennial grasssoil germination seed banksoil seed bankupper growth grasses

Identifiers

PMID37854116
PMCPMC10580286
OpenAlexW4387309592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.