ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023
Joint classification and segmentation for an interpretable diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome from chest x-rays.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition that can cause a dramatic drop in blood oxygen levels due to widespread lung inflammation. Chest radiography is widely used as a primary modality to detect ARDS due to its crucial role in diagnosing the syndrome, and the x-ray images can be obtained promptly. However, despite the extensive literature on chest x-ray (CXR) image analysis, there is limited research on ARDS diagnosis due to the scarcity of ARDS-labeled datasets. Additionally, many machine learning-based approaches result in high performance in pulmonary disease diagnosis, but their decisions are often not easily interpretable, which can hinder their clinical acceptance. This work aims to develop a method for detecting signs of ARDS in CXR images that can be clinically interpretable. Approach: To achieve this goal, an ARDS-labeled dataset of chest radiography images is gathered and annotated for training and evaluation of the proposed approach. The proposed deep classification-segmentation model, Dense-Ynet, provides an interpretable framework for automatically diagnosing ARDS in CXR images. The model takes advantage of lung segmentation in diagnosing ARDS. By definition, ARDS causes bilateral diffuse infiltrates throughout the lungs. To consider the local involvement of lung areas, each lung is divided into upper and lower halves, and our model classifies the resulting lung quadrants. Results: The quadrant-based classification strategy yields the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 95.1% (95% CI 93.5 to 96.1), which allows for providing a reference for the model's predictions. In terms of segmentation, the model accurately identifies lung regions in CXR images even when lung boundaries are unclear in abnormal images. Conclusions: This study provides an interpretable decision system for diagnosing ARDS, by following the definition used by clinicians for the diagnosis of ARDS from CXR images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.