Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37854077›Full record

ReviewACS ES&T engineering2023

A Critical Review of Data Science Applications in Resource Recovery and Carbon Capture from Organic Waste.

Mohammed T Zaki, Lewis S Rowles, Donald A Adjeroh, Kevin D Orner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS ES&T engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammed T ZakiWadsworth Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7197-0608
Lewis S RowlesDepartment of Civil Engineering and Construction, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia 30458, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3489-9179
Donald A AdjerohLane Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, United States.
Kevin D OrnerWadsworth Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8090-7603

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Municipal and agricultural organic waste can be treated to recover energy, nutrients, and carbon through resource recovery and carbon capture (RRCC) technologies such as anaerobic digestion, struvite precipitation, and pyrolysis. Data science could benefit such technologies by improving their efficiency through data-driven process modeling along with reducing environmental and economic burdens via life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA), respectively. We critically reviewed 616 peer-reviewed articles on the use of data science in RRCC published during 2002-2022. Although applications of machine learning (ML) methods have drastically increased over time for modeling RRCC technologies, the reviewed studies exhibited significant knowledge gaps at various model development stages. In terms of sustainability, an increasing number of studies included LCA with TEA to quantify both environmental and economic impacts of RRCC. Integration of ML methods with LCA and TEA has the potential to cost-effectively investigate the trade-off between efficiency and sustainability of RRCC, although the literature lacked such integration of techniques. Therefore, we propose an integrated data science framework to inform efficient and sustainable RRCC from organic waste based on the review. Overall, the findings from this review can inform practitioners about the effective utilization of various data science methods for real-world implementation of RRCC technologies.

Identifiers

PMID37854077
PMCPMC10580293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.