Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37853673›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2023

Sex-specific differences in pain localization in female patients with endometriosis: A comparison of sexless and female human body outlines.

Natasza Szczypien, Zoe Ruchay, Zino Ruchay, Sandra Verena Müller, Claudia Kaiser, Frank Klawonn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natasza SzczypienInstitute for Information Engineering, Faculty of Computer Science, Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, Wolfenbüttel, Germany.
Zoe RuchayFaculty of Social Work, Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, Wolfenbüttel, Germany.
Zino RuchayClinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel, Germany.
Sandra Verena MüllerFaculty of Social Work, Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, Wolfenbüttel, Germany.
Claudia KaiserFaculty of Social Work, Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, Wolfenbüttel, Germany.
Frank KlawonnInstitute for Information Engineering, Faculty of Computer Science, Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, Wolfenbüttel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9613-182X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study explores sex-specific differences in pain localization using pain drawings in female patients with endometriosis. Traditional human body outlines (HBOs) used for pain drawings are often viewed as male, making accurate pain assessment difficult. The study aims to compare pain localization and extent between patients presented with sexless and female HBOs.

methodsA total of 49 female patients with endometriosis completed questionnaires and pain drawings (n = 24 and n = 26 with individually designed sexless and female HBOs, respectively). The Ruzika similarity index was used to investigate potential differences in pain drawings between sexless and female HBOs. Hypothesis testing was applied to compare the number of pixels marked in the pain extents and to investigate the suitability of the presented body outline.

resultsSex of HBOs used in pain drawings had no effect on pain area, and no statistically significant differences were found in pain localization or area between female and sexless outlines. Most, but not all participants found the body outlines suitable.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that differences in the resulting areas marked in the pain drawings were negligible and the preferences for sexless pain drawings were not significant, so that a sexless body outline for pain drawings could be a good choice, especially when a study does not focus on one specific sex.

Indexed as

EndometriosisFemaleHuman BodyHumansMalePainendometriosispain drawingpain profilesex/gender differences

Identifiers

PMID37853673
PMCPMC10726775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.