Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37853499›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2023

Validation of the Chinese version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: evidence from a three-wave longitudinal study.

Chen Jiang, Yihong Zhu, Yi Luo, Chee-Seng Tan, Stefanos Mastrotheodoros, Patrício Costa, Li Chen, Lina Guo, Haiyan Ma, Runtang Meng

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07548463 (Playback Theatre Program on Improving Mental Health for Adolescents and Youth), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07548463 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Playback Theatre Program on Improving Mental Health for Adolescents and Youth

TypeinterventionalSponsorCity University of Hong KongRan2026 to 2027Enrolled120ConditionsDepresssionArmsPlayback theatre program, Waitlist control group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chen Jiang *School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 311121, Zhejiang, China.
Yihong Zhu *School of Clinical Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yi Luo *School of Nursing, Ningbo College of Health Sciences, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
Chee-Seng TanSchool of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts, Wenzhou-Kean University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Stefanos MastrotheodorosDepartment of Psychology, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece.
Patrício CostaLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Li ChenDigestive System Department, Yan'an Hospital of Kunming City, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Lina GuoDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Haiyan MaSchool of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 311121, Zhejiang, China. mahaiyan@hznu.edu.cn.
Runtang Meng *School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 311121, Zhejiang, China. mengruntang@hznu.edu.cn.

Funding

Medical Research Fund of Zhejiang Province 2023RC073Research Initiation Fund of Hangzhou Normal University RWSK20201003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 10-item Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) is a widely used tool for individuals to self-report their self-esteem; however, the factorial structures of translated versions of the RSES vary across different languages. This study aimed to validate the Chinese version of the RSES in the Chinese mainland using a longitudinal design.

methodsA group of healthcare university students completed the RSES across three waves: baseline, 1-week follow-up, and 15-week follow-up. A total of 481 valid responses were collected through the three-wave data collection process. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on the baseline data to explore the potential factorial structure, while confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed on the follow-up data to determine the best-fit model. Additionally, the cross-sectional and longitudinal measurement invariances were tested to assess the measurement properties of the RSES for different groups, such as gender and age, as well as across different time points. Convergent validity was assessed against the Self-Rated Health Questionnaire (SRHQ) using Spearman's correlation. Internal consistency was examined using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients, while test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient.

resultsThe results of EFA revealed that Items 5, 8, and 9 had inadequate or cross-factor loadings, leading to their removal from further analysis. Analysis of the remaining seven items using EFA suggested a two-factor solution. A comparison of several potential models for the 10-item and 7-item RSES using CFA showed a preference for the 7-item form (RSES-7) with two factors. Furthermore, the RSES-7 exhibited strict invariance across different groups and time points, indicating its stability and consistency. The RSES-7 also demonstrated adequate convergent validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability, which further supported its robustness as a measure of self-esteem.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that the RSES-7 is a psychometrically sound and brief self-report scale for measuring self-esteem in the Chinese context. More studies are warranted to further verify its usability.

Indexed as

LanguageCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesLongitudinal studyMeasurement invariancePsychometric propertiesRosenberg Self-Esteem ScaleValidation

Identifiers

PMID37853499
PMCPMC10585735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.