Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37853492›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2023

Prediction of organic compound aqueous solubility using machine learning: a comparison study of descriptor-based and fingerprints-based models.

Arash Tayyebi, Ali S Alshami, Zeinab Rabiei, Xue Yu, Nadhem Ismail, Musabbir Jahan Talukder, Jason Power

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A High-Performance and Interpretable pMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Predicting SJournal of chemical theory and computation · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arash TayyebiUniversity of North Dakota, Chemical Engineering, Grand Forks, ND, 58201, USA.
Ali S AlshamiUniversity of North Dakota, Chemical Engineering, Grand Forks, ND, 58201, USA. ali.alshami@und.edu.
Zeinab RabieiChemistry Department, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, 58202, USA.
Xue YuEnergy & Environmental Research Center, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, 58202, USA.
Nadhem IsmailUniversity of North Dakota, Chemical Engineering, Grand Forks, ND, 58201, USA.
Musabbir Jahan TalukderUniversity of North Dakota, Chemical Engineering, Grand Forks, ND, 58201, USA.
Jason PowerUniversity of North Dakota, Biomedical Sciences, Grand Forks, ND, 58202, USA.

Funding

City of Grand Forks UND0027392State of North Dakota UND0026282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A reliable and practical determination of a chemical species' solubility in water continues to be examined using empirical observations and exhaustive experimental studies alone. Predictions of chemical solubility in water using data-driven algorithms can allow us to create a rationally designed, efficient, and cost-effective tool for next-generation materials and chemical formulations. We present results from two machine learning (ML) modeling studies to adequately predict various species' solubility using data for over 8400 compounds. Molecular-descriptors, the most used method in previous studies, and Morgan fingerprint, a circular-based hash of the molecules' structures, were applied to produce water solubility estimates. We trained all models on 80% of the total datasets using the Random Forest (RFs) technique as the regressor and tested the prediction performance using the remaining 20%, resulting in coefficient of determination (R

Indexed as

Aqueous solubilityFingerprintMachine learningRandom forestSHAP

Identifiers

PMID37853492
PMCPMC10583449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.