Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37853485›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

OptiCogs: feasibility of a multicomponent intervention to rehabilitate people with cognitive impairment post-stroke.

Mairéad O' Donoghue, Pauline Boland, Sinead Taylor, Edel Hennessy, Eva Murphy, Siobhan Leahy, John McManus, Dominika Lisiecka, Helen Purtill, Rose Galvin and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05414539 (A Multicomponent Intervention to Rehabilitate Cognitive Impairment in People Post-stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05414539 nacompletednot on this map

A Multicomponent Intervention to Rehabilitate Cognitive Impairment in People Post-stroke: Single-arm Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LimerickRan2022 to 2022Enrolled9ConditionsStroke, Cardiovascular, Cognitive ImpairmentArmsOptiCogs Online
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mairéad O' Donoghue *School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94 T9PX, Ireland. mairead.odonoghue@ul.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0546-0933
Pauline Boland *School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94 T9PX, Ireland.
Sinead Taylor *Acute Stroke and Neurology Services, UL Hospitals Group, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Edel Hennessy *Early Supported Discharge, UL Hospitals Group, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Eva Murphy *Early Supported Discharge, UL Hospitals Group, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Siobhan Leahy *Department of Sport, Exercise and Nutrition, School of Science and Computing, Mayo Institute of Technology, Dublin Road, GalwayGalway, Ireland.
John McManus *Acute Stroke and Neurology Services, UL Hospitals Group, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Dominika Lisiecka *Department of Nursing and Healthcare Sciences, School of Health and Social Sciences, Munster Technological University Kerry Campus, Kerry, Ireland.
Helen Purtill *Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Rose Galvin *School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94 T9PX, Ireland.
Sara Hayes *School of Allied Health, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, V94 T9PX, Ireland.
University of Limerick · IEUniversity Hospital Limerick · IEGalway-Mayo Institute of Technology · IEMunster Technological University · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Despite the prevalence and associated burden of cognitive impairment post-stroke, there is uncertainty regarding optimal cognitive rehabilitation for people post-stroke. This study aimed to assess whether a multicomponent intervention, called OptiCogs, is feasible, acceptable, and safe for people with cognitive impairment post-stroke. A secondary aim was to explore changes in cognitive function, fatigue, quality of life, physical function, and occupational performance, from pre-intervention to post-intervention.

methodsA feasibility study was conducted where people post-stroke with cognitive impairment enrolled in a 6-week multicomponent intervention. The primary outcomes recorded included response rate, recruitment rate, retention rate, adherence to the intervention protocol, adverse events, and acceptability of the intervention to people post-stroke. Secondary outcomes included (i) change in cognitive functioning using the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III, (ii) fatigue using the Fatigue Severity scale, (iii) quality of life using the Stroke Specific Quality of Life scale (iv) physical function using the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system, and (v) patient-reported occupational performance using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials extension reporting guidelines were followed, for pilot and feasibility studies, to standardize the conduct and reporting of this study.

resultsThe response rate was 10.9%. Nine eligible participants were enrolled during the 4-month recruitment period, with eight participants completing the entire 6-week intervention, as well as the pre- and post-intervention outcome measures. There were no reported adverse events. Participants were satisfied with the intervention and found it acceptable overall. Results of the secondary outcomes were promising for cognitive function (ACE III, pre: 63.3 ± 23.9 to post: 69 ± 24.6), fatigue (FSS, pre: 52.5 ± 7.3 to post: 45.6 ± 7.2), quality of life (SSQoL, pre: 131.0 ± 26.3 to post: 169.9 ± 15.3), physical function (PROMIS-PF, pre: 15.5 ± 6.3 to post: 15.8 ± 5.3), and occupational performance (COPM performance, pre: 9.3 ± 2.3 to post: 22.9 ± 4.2) and COPM satisfaction, pre: 9.9 ± 2.1 to post: 22.7 ± 3.5).

conclusionPreliminary results suggest low-modest recruitment and high retention rates for the OptiCogs intervention. Changes in cognitive function, fatigue, quality of life, and self-reported occupational performance show improvement from pre- to post-intervention. These potential benefits require further testing in a larger pilot trial.

trial registrationNCT05414539.

Indexed as

Cognitive impairmentFeasibilityMulticomponent interventionStroke

Identifiers

PMID37853485
PMCPMC10583340
OpenAlexW4387740647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.