Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37853430›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2023

Predicting acute kidney injury with an artificial intelligence-driven model in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit.

Tiziana Fragasso, Valeria Raggi, Davide Passaro, Luca Tardella, Giovanna Jona Lasinio, Zaccaria Ricci

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. New Insights into Cardiac Intensive Care.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Research progress on biomarkers for acute kidney injury in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tiziana FragassoPediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza S.Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy. tiziana.fragasso@opbg.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1115-9709
Valeria RaggiPediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza S.Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy.
Davide PassaroDepartment of Statistical Sciences, Sapienza - University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Luca TardellaDepartment of Statistical Sciences, Sapienza - University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giovanna Jona LasinioDepartment of Statistical Sciences, Sapienza - University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Zaccaria RicciPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Meyer Children's University Hospital, IRCCS, Florence, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITMeyer Children's Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is among the most common complications following cardiac surgery in adult and pediatric patients, significantly affecting morbidity and mortality. Artificial Intelligence (AI) with Machine Learning (ML) can be used to predict outcomes. AKI diagnosis anticipation may be an ideal target of these methods. The scope of the study is building a Machine Learning (ML) train model with Random Forest (RF) algorithm, based on electronic health record (EHR) data, able to forecast AKI continuously after 48 h in post-cardiac surgery children, and to test its performance. Four hundred nineteen consecutive patients out of 1115 hospital admissions were enrolled in a single-center retrospective study. Patients were younger than 18 years and admitted from August 2018 to February 2020 in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU) undergoing cardiac surgery, invasive procedure (hemodynamic studies), and medical conditions with complete EHR records and discharged after 48 h or more.

resultsThirty-six variables were selected to build the algorithm according to commonly described cardiac surgery-associated AKI clinical predictors. We evaluated different models for different outcomes: binary AKI (no AKI vs. AKI), severe AKI (no-mild vs severe AKI), and multiclass classification (maximum AKI and the most frequent level of AKI, mode AKI). The algorithm performance was assessed with the area under the curve receiver operating characteristics (AUC ROC) for binary classification, with accuracy and K for multiclass classification. AUC ROC for binary AKI was 0.93 (95% CI 0.92-0.94), and for severe AKI was 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-1). Mode AKI accuracy was 0.95, and K was 0.80 (95% CI 0.94-0.96); maximum AKI accuracy was 0.92, and K was 0.71 (95% CI 0.91-0.93). The importance matrix plot demonstrated creatinine, basal creatinine, platelets count, adrenaline support, and lactate dehydrogenase for binary AKI with the addition of cardiopulmonary bypass duration for severe AKI as the most relevant variables of the model.

conclusionsWe validated a ML model to detect AKI occurring after 48 h in a retrospective observational study that could help clinicians in individuating patients at risk of AKI, in which a preventive strategy can be determinant to improve the occurrence of renal dysfunction.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryElectronic health recordMachine learningPediatric cardiac intensive care unitPredictive modelsRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID37853430
PMCPMC10583404
OpenAlexW4387730563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.