Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37853422›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2023

Demonstrating the learning and impact of embedding participant involvement in a pandemic research study: the experience of the SARS-CoV-2 immunity & reinfection evaluation (SIREN) study UK, 2020-2023.

Anna Howells, Erika Neves Aquino, Deepika Bose, Martin Gerard Kelly, Barbara Molony-Oates, Asmah Hassan Syed, Kim Tolley, Claire Neill, Susan Hopkins, Victoria Hall and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An analysis of the Mental Health of Black Canadians Fund: facilitators of success, challenges and recommendations.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Anna HowellsUK Health Security Agency, Nobel House, London, SW1P 3HX, UK.
Erika Neves AquinoBritish Society for Immunology, 9 Appold Street, London, EC2A 2AP, UK.
Deepika BoseMedical Offices, Stratheden Hospital, Cupar, KY15 5RR, UK.
Martin Gerard KellyAltnagelvin Area Hospital, Glenshane Road, Derry, BT47 6SB, UK.
Barbara Molony-OatesHealth Research Authority, 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ, UK.
Asmah Hassan SyedLister Hospital, Stevenage, SG1 4AB, UK.
Kim TolleyThe Health and Care Professions Council, Park House, 184-186 Kennington Park Road, London, SE11 4BU, UK.
Claire NeillUK Health Security Agency, Nobel House, London, SW1P 3HX, UK.
Susan HopkinsUK Health Security Agency, Nobel House, London, SW1P 3HX, UK.
Victoria HallUK Health Security Agency, Nobel House, London, SW1P 3HX, UK.
Jasmin IslamUK Health Security Agency, Nobel House, London, SW1P 3HX, UK. jasmin.islam@ukhsa.gov.uk.
Department of Health and Social Care · GBUK Health Security AgencyAltnagelvin Area Hospital · GBEducation Authority · GBLister Hospital · GBStratheden Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/W02067X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParticipant involvement in research studies is not a new concept, yet barriers to implementation remain and application varies. This is particularly true for pandemic response research studies, where timeframes are condensed, pressure is high and the value and inclusion of participant involvement can be overlooked. The SIREN Participant Involvement Panel (PIP) provides a case study for participant involvement in pandemic research, working in partnership with people who the research is for and about.

methodsSIREN and the British Society for Immunology (BSI) recruited and ran two phases of the PIP, involving 15 members in total over a 16-month period. Phase 1 ran between January and August 2022 and Phase 2 between October 2022 and March 2023. Activity figures including recruitment interest and PIP meeting attendance were recorded. To evaluate how the PIP has influenced SIREN, feedback was collected from (a) researchers presenting at the PIP and (b) PIP members themselves. Evaluation at the end of Phase 1 informed our approach to Phase 2. Thematic grouping was planned to identify key lessons learned.

resultsApplications increased from n = 30 to n = 485 between Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the PIP, a more than 15-fold increase. The SIREN PIP positively impacted the design, implementation and evaluation phases of the study and sub-studies. Feedback from PIP members themselves was positive, with members highlighting that they found the role rewarding and felt valued. Learnings from the PIP have been condensed into five key themes for applying to future pandemic response research studies: the importance of dedicated resources; recruiting the right panel; understanding motivations for participant involvement; providing flexible options for involvement and enabling the early involvement of participants.

conclusionsThe SIREN PIP has demonstrated the value of actively involving people who research is for and about. The PIP has provided an active feedback mechanism for research and demonstrated a positive influence on both SIREN study researchers and PIP members themselves. This paper makes the case for participant involvement in future pandemic research studies. Future work should include improved training for researchers and we would support the development of a national PIP forum as part of future pandemic research preparedness.

Indexed as

CoronavirusCOVID-19Pandemic responseParticipant engagementParticipant involvementPatient and public involvementPPISARS-CoV-2SIREN

Identifiers

PMID37853422
PMCPMC10585763
OpenAlexW4387765010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.