Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37853405›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2023

Molecular surveillance and genetic diversity of Anaplasma spp. in cattle (Bos taurus) and goat (Capra aegagrus hircus) from Hainan island/province, China.

Sa Zhou, Liangyuan Huang, Yang Lin, Biswajit Bhowmick, Jianguo Zhao, Chenghong Liao, Qingfeng Guan, Jinhua Wang, Qian Han

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Microscopic and molecular detection ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Anaplasma capra: a new emerging tick-borne zoonotic pathogen.Veterinary research communications · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sa Zhou *One Health Institute, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, Hainan, China.
Liangyuan Huang *One Health Institute, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, Hainan, China.
Yang LinOne Health Institute, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, Hainan, China.
Biswajit BhowmickOne Health Institute, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, Hainan, China.
Jianguo ZhaoOne Health Institute, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, Hainan, China.
Chenghong LiaoOne Health Institute, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, Hainan, China.
Qingfeng GuanOne Health Institute, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, Hainan, China.
Jinhua WangOne Health Institute, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, Hainan, China. 990808@hainanu.edu.cn.
Qian HanOne Health Institute, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, Hainan, China. qianhan@hainanu.edu.cn.
Hainan University · CNHainan Agricultural School · CNHainan Medical University · CN

Funding

Major Science and Technology Plan of Hainan Province ZDKJ2021035National Natural Science Foundation of China U22A20363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaplasmosis is a highly prevalent tick-borne intracellular bacterial disease that affects various host species globally, particularly ruminants in tropical and subtropical regions. However, information regarding the distribution and epidemiology of anaplasmosis in small and large ruminants on Hainan Isalnd is limited. To address this knowledge gap, the present study aimed to assess the occurrence of Anaplasma spp. infections in goats (N = 731) and cattle (N = 176) blood samples using nested PCR and conventional PCR based assays. The results revealed an overall prevalence of 30.1% in goats and 14.8% in cattle. The infection rates of A. bovis, A. phagocytophilum, A. ovis and A. capra in goat samples were 22.7%, 13.8%, 2.0% and 3.4%, respectively, while the infection rates of A. bovis, A. phagocytophilum and A. marginale in cattle samples were 11.4%, 6.3% and 5.7%, respectively. A. bovis exhibited the highest prevalence among the Anaplasma spp. in both goat and cattle samples. In addition, the most frequent co-infection was the one with A. phagocytophilum and A. bovis. It was found that the age, sex and feeding habits of cattle and goats were considered to be important risk factors. Evaluation of the risk factor relating to the rearing system showed that the infection rate for the free-range goats and cattle was significantly higher when compared with stall-feeding system.This study represents one of the largest investigations on the distribution, prevalence, and risk factors associated with Anaplasma infection in ruminants on Hainan Island, highlighting a higher circulation of the infection in the region than previously anticipated. Further reasesrch is necessary to investigate tick vectors, reservoir animals, and the zoonotic potential of the Anaplasma spp. in this endemic region of Hainan Island.

Indexed as

AnaplasmosisCattle DiseasesGoat DiseasesSheep DiseasesTick-Borne DiseasesAnaplasmaAnimalsCattleChinaGenetic VariationGoatsPhylogenyRuminantsSheepAnaplasmaCo-infectionHainanNested PCRRuminants

Identifiers

PMID37853405
PMCPMC10583423
OpenAlexW4387740381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.