ReviewBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023
Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn: rapid review of postnatal care and outcomes.
Review in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Study Design of the Global Prospective Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn Registry (GERANIUM).American journal of perinatology · 2026Article
- The influence of early intravenous immunoglobulin administration on the prognosis of severe hemolytic disorders in neonates.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Feasibility of Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn Case Ascertainment and Assessing Its Impact on Prenatal and Postnatal Outcomes: Protocol for Observational Studies.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of pregnancies at-risk of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in Sweden, Finland, and Denmark: a population-based register study.AJOG global reports · 2025Article
- Factors Behind Decreased Red Cell Antibody and Hemolytic Disease of Fetus and Newborn Rates: Single Center Experience.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2025Article
- Variations and Opportunities in Postnatal Management of Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn.JAMA network open · 2025Observational
- P-Selectin, Vascular Endothelial Cadherin, and Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 as Novel Biomarkers for ABO Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in postnatal care for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) have occurred over the past decades, but little is known regarding the frequency of postnatal treatment and the clinical outcomes of affected neonates. Most studies reporting on HDFN originate from high-income countries or relatively large centers, but important differences between centers and countries may exist due to differences in prevalence and available treatment options. We therefore aimed to evaluate the postnatal treatment landscape and clinical outcomes in neonates with Rhesus factor D (Rh(D))- and/or K-mediated HDFN and to provide recommendations for future research.
methodsWe conducted a rapid literature review of case reports and series, observational retrospective and prospective cohort studies, and trials describing pregnancies or children affected by Rh(D)- or K-mediated HDFN published between 2005 and 2021. Information relevant to the treatment of HDFN and clinical outcomes was extracted. Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov and EMBASE were searched for relevant studies by two independent reviewers through title/abstract and full-text screening. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed methodological quality of included studies.
resultsForty-three studies reporting postnatal data were included. The median frequency of exchange transfusions was 6.0% [interquartile range (IQR): 0.0-20.0] in K-mediated HDFN and 26.5% [IQR: 18.0-42.9] in Rh(D)-mediated HDFN. The median use of simple red blood cell transfusions in K-mediated HDFN was 50.0% [IQR: 25.0-56.0] and 60.0% [IQR: 20.0-72.0] in Rh(D)-mediated HDFN. Large differences in transfusion rates were found between centers. Neonatal mortality amongst cases treated with intrauterine transfusion(s) was 1.2% [IQR: 0-4.4]. Guidelines and thresholds for exchange transfusions and simple RBC transfusions were reported in 50% of studies.
conclusionMost included studies were from middle- to high-income countries. No studies with a higher level of evidence from centers in low-income countries were available. We noted a shortage and inconsistency in the reporting of relevant data and provide recommendations for future reports. Although large variations between studies was found and information was often missing, analysis showed that the postnatal burden of HDFN, including need for neonatal interventions, remains high. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021234940. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021234940 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.