Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37853254›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

Efficacy of photobiomodulation in the treatment of oral mucositis in patients undergoing antineoplastic therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Adriana Regina Cruz, Eliana Maria Minicucci, Marluci Betini, Luciana Almeida-Lopes, Victor Tieghi Neto, Antonio José Maria Cataneo

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Intraoral vs. extraoral photobiomodulation therapy for oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients: a multicenter, randomized, single-blind clinical trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of structured oral care strategies on oral mucositis in patients receiving 5-fluorouracil: a retrospective cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Adriana Regina CruzProgram of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University Unesp, Medical School, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil. cruz_adriana06@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0263-8641
Eliana Maria MinicucciClinical Hospital of São Paulo State University Unesp, Medical School, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4664-6929
Marluci BetiniReference Technical Section, University Unesp, Medical School, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8069-6930
Luciana Almeida-LopesInstitute of Research and Learning in the Area of Health - NUPEN, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5873-2656
Victor Tieghi NetoDepartment of Dentistry, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0097-0045
Antonio José Maria CataneoSurgery and Orthopedics Department, University Unesp, Medical School, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2330-9337
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRHospital de Câncer de Barretos · BRInstitute of Physics · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effectiveness of photobiomodulation in the treatment of oral mucositis.

methodsSystematic review and meta-analysis encompassing in the electronic databases: LILACS, MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE, SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE, and CINAHL and in http://clinicaltrials.gov . Eligibility criteria were randomized, non-randomized, and observational studies that used photobiomodulation for the treatment of oral mucositis. The endpoints were reduction in the severity of oral mucositis, duration of lesions, and pain reduction. For data analysis, the Review Manager 5.4 program was used.

resultsA total of 316 studies were identified, 297 in the electronic databases and 19 in http://clinicaltrials.gov . After removing duplicates, 260 studies were selected for title and abstract reading, of which 223 were excluded. A total of 37 studies were chosen for full reading, of which 6 were included in the review, totaling 299 patients. The treatment used was photobiomodulation. The patients were divided into two groups: the laser group used only photobiomodulation or associated with other therapies, and the control group did not use photobiomodulation. For the endpoint reduction in the severity of oral mucositis (OM), the chance of reduction of the OM was greater in the laser group as compared to the control group. For the endpoints duration of OM lesions and pain reduction, it was not possible to carry out a meta-analysis due to the high heterogeneity between studies. In the interpretation of the meta-analysis, the reduction in the severity of oral mucositis was greater in the group that received photobiomodulation.

conclusionPhotobiomodulation was effective in the treatment of oral mucositis.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsLow-Level Light TherapyOral UlcerStomatitisHumansPainAntineoplastic AgentsLow-level laserOncologyOral mucositisPhotobiomodulation

Identifiers

PMID37853254
OpenAlexW4387765617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.