Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37853247›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2023

Quantitative

Rachele Danieli, Martina Stella, Julian Leube, Johannes Tran-Gia, Clementine Marin, Carlos F Uribe, Bruno Vanderlinden, Nick Reynaert, Patrick Flamen, Hugo Levillain

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Optimisation of Q.Clear (BSREM) Reconstruction Parameters forBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Quantitative accuracy ofEJNMMI physics · 2026
    Article
  5. QuantitativeEJNMMI physics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Quantitative SPECT/CT: Technique and Clinical Applications.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Design and Evaluation of a Portable Pinhole SPECT System forDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Individual and Simultaneous Imaging ofIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  16. Bias and precision of SPECT-basedEJNMMI physics · 2024
    Article
  17. 360° CZT-SPECT/CT cameras:EJNMMI physics · 2024
    Article
  18. EANM perspectives for CZT SPECT in brain applications.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachele DanieliDepartment of Medical Physics, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. rachele.danieli@hubruxelles.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8013-4938
Martina StellaRadiophysics and MRI Physics Laboratory, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Julian LeubeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Johannes Tran-GiaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Clementine MarinDepartment of Medical Physics, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Carlos F UribeFunctional Imaging, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Bruno VanderlindenDepartment of Medical Physics, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Nick ReynaertDepartment of Medical Physics, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Patrick FlamenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Hugo LevillainDepartment of Medical Physics, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDosimetry after radiopharmaceutical therapy with

methodsA series of

resultsThe accuracy of the activity from the cylinder, although affected by septal penetration, was < 10% for all reconstructions. Both algorithms featured improved spatial resolution and higher RCs with increasing updates at the cost of noise build-up, but Q.Clear outperformed GE-OSEM in reducing noise accumulation. When the reconstruction parameters were carefully selected, similar values for noise (~0.15), spatial resolution (~1 cm) and RCs were found, irrespective of the reconstruction algorithm. Analogue results were found in patients.

conclusionsAccurate activity quantification is possible when imaging

Indexed as

Block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM)CalibrationCZT digital detectorsDosimetryImage reconstructionQuantitative Lu-177 SPECTSPECT/CT

Identifiers

PMID37853247
PMCPMC10584798
OpenAlexW4387765660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.