Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37853238›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Ultrasound imaging of the testes in children and adolescents].

R Wunsch

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

R WunschKlinik für Radiologie, Kinderradiologie und Nuklearmedizin, St. Elisabeth Gruppe GmbH, Katholische Kliniken Rhein-Ruhr, Marienhospital Witten, Marienplatz 2, 58452, Witten, Deutschland. rainer.wunsch@elisabethgruppe.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUltrasound, the imaging method of choice to evaluate abnormalities of the testes and the scrotum, provides accurate anatomic details and allows the assessment of perfusion using color Doppler and power Doppler. Ultrasound represents a rapid and reliable procedure which in most cases leads to a conclusive diagnosis. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS: The three most common conditions in the clinical picture of acute scrotum are testicular torsion, torsion of the testicular appendages and inflammatory changes of the testis and the epididymis (epididymo-orchitis). Especially in the case of testicular torsion, rapid diagnosis is essential since time is an important factor to initiate organ-preserving therapy. EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGY: High-frequency linear array transducer (at least 10 MHz), which allows detection of slow flow rates, is recommended.

Indexed as

Spermatic Cord TorsionTestisAcute DiseaseAdolescentChildHumansMaleUltrasonographyUltrasonography, Doppler, ColorAcute scrotumChildrenColor DopplerTesticular abnormalitiesUltrasonography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.