Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37853176›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Predicting meningioma grades and pathologic marker expression via deep learning.

Jiawei Chen, Yanping Xue, Leihao Ren, Kun Lv, Peng Du, Haixia Cheng, Shuchen Sun, Lingyang Hua, Qing Xie, Ruiqi Wu and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Advancements in the application of MRI radiomics in meningioma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  17. Preoperative diagnosis of meningioma sinus invasion based on MRI radiomics and deep learning: a multicenter study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jiawei ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery of Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yanping XueDepartment of Neurosurgery of Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Leihao RenDepartment of Neurosurgery of Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Kun LvDepartment of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Peng DuDepartment of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Haixia ChengDepartment of Pathology, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shuchen SunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shanghai International Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Lingyang HuaDepartment of Neurosurgery of Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qing XieDepartment of Neurosurgery of Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. neurosurgeon.qing@gmail.com.
Ruiqi WuDepartment of Neurosurgery of Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. ruiqiwu@fudan.edu.cn.
Ye GongDepartment of Neurosurgery of Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. gong_ye@fudan.edu.cn.
Huashan Hospital · CNFudan University · CNState Key Laboratory of Medical NeurobiologyTongren Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82072788Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 22140900200Shanghai Sailing Program 20YF1403900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo establish a deep learning (DL) model for predicting tumor grades and expression of pathologic markers of meningioma.

methodsA total of 1192 meningioma patients from two centers who underwent surgical resection between September 2018 and December 2021 were retrospectively included. The pathological data and post-contrast T1-weight images for each patient were collected. The patients from institute I were subdivided into training, validation, and testing sets, while the patients from institute II served as the external testing cohort. The fine-tuned ResNet50 model based on transfer learning was adopted to classify WHO grade in the whole cohort and predict Ki-67 index, H3K27me3, and progesterone receptor (PR) status of grade 1 meningiomas. The predictive performance was evaluated by the accuracy and loss curve, confusion matrix, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and area under curve (AUC).

resultsThe DL prediction model for each label achieved high predictive performance in two cohorts. For WHO grade prediction, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.966 (95%CI 0.957-0.975) in the internal testing set and 0.669 (95%CI 0.643-0.695) in the external validation cohort. The AUC in predicting Ki-67 index, H3K27me3, and PR status were 0.905 (95%CI 0.895-0.915), 0.773 (95%CI 0.760-0.786), and 0.771 (95%CI 0.750-0.792) in the internal testing set and 0.591 (95%CI 0.562-0.620), 0.658 (95%CI 0.648-0.668), and 0.703 (95%CI 0.674-0.732) in the external validation cohort, respectively.

conclusionDL models can preoperatively predict meningioma grades and pathologic marker expression with favorable predictive performance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our DL model could predict meningioma grades and expression of pathologic markers and identify high-risk patients with WHO grade 1 meningioma, which would suggest a more aggressive operative intervention preoperatively and a more frequent follow-up schedule postoperatively. KEY POINTS: WHO grades and some pathologic markers of meningioma were associated with therapeutic strategies and clinical outcomes. A deep learning-based approach was employed to develop a model for predicting meningioma grades and the expression of pathologic markers. Preoperative prediction of meningioma grades and the expression of pathologic markers was beneficial for clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDeep LearningMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaNeoplasm GradingAdultAgedFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorKi-67 AntigenDeep learningMagnetic resonance imagingMeningiomaRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID37853176
OpenAlexW4387764972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.